All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Is It Money That Matters?: Governmental Healthcare Expenditures, Other Forms of Death and Right-to-Die Legislation
Unformatted Document Text:  15 15 REFERENCES Atchley, R.C., and A.S. Barusch. 2004. Social Forces & Aging: An Introduction to Social Gerontology, 10 th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Barro, Robert J. and Rachel M. McCleary. 2003. “International Determinants of Religiosity.” Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Bates, B. 2002. “Oregon Law Yields Better End-of-Life Planning: Few Physician-Assisted Suicides Reported.” Family Practice News 32(8):29-30. Bennett, Colin J. 1991. “What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?” British Journal of Political Science 21:215.33. Berry, Francis Stokes, and William D. Berry. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84:395-416. Central Intelligence Agency - World Factbook. 2004. Retrieved on November 15, 2004 from http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/fields/ 2010.html. Cohen-Almagor, R. 2002. “Why the Netherlands?” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30(1):95-106. Emanuel, E.J. 2001. “Euthanasia: Where the Netherlands Leads Will the World Follow?” British Medical Journal 322:1376. Euthanasia.com. 2003. http://www.euthanasia.com/definitions.html Fontana, J.S. 2002. “Rational Suicide in the Terminally Ill.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship 34(2):147-52. Gittelman, D.K. 1999. “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.” Southern Medical Journal 92(4): 369-74. Glick, Henry R., and Scott P. Hays. 1991. “Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of State Living Will Laws.” Journal of Politics 53:835-50. Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science Review 67:1174-85. International Anti-Euthanasia Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Retrieved on June 5, 2003 from, http://www.iaetf.org

Authors: Schraufnagel, Scot. and Tiggerington, Victoria.
first   previous   Page 16 of 22   next   last



background image
15
15
REFERENCES
Atchley, R.C., and A.S. Barusch. 2004. Social Forces & Aging: An Introduction to Social
Gerontology, 10
th
edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Barro, Robert J. and Rachel M. McCleary. 2003. “International Determinants of Religiosity.”
Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bates, B. 2002. “Oregon Law Yields Better End-of-Life Planning: Few Physician-Assisted
Suicides Reported.” Family Practice News 32(8):29-30.
Bennett, Colin J. 1991. “What is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?” British Journal of
Political Science 21:215.33.
Berry, Francis Stokes, and William D. Berry. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy
Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 84:395-416.
Central Intelligence Agency - World Factbook. 2004. Retrieved on November 15, 2004 from
http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/fields/ 2010.html.
Cohen-Almagor, R. 2002. “Why the Netherlands?” Journal of Law, Medicine and
Ethics 30(1):95-106.
Emanuel, E.J. 2001. “Euthanasia: Where the Netherlands Leads Will the World Follow?” British
Medical Journal 322:1376.
Euthanasia.com. 2003. http://www.euthanasia.com/definitions.html
Fontana, J.S. 2002. “Rational Suicide in the Terminally Ill.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship
34(2):147-52.
Gittelman, D.K. 1999. “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.” Southern Medical
Journal 92(4): 369-74.
Glick, Henry R., and Scott P. Hays. 1991. “Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking:
Theory and the Evolution of State Living Will Laws.” Journal of Politics 53:835-50.
Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science
Review 67:1174-85.
International Anti-Euthanasia Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Retrieved
on June 5, 2003 from, http://www.iaetf.org


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 16 of 22   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.