|
|
|
|
Competition or Consolidation? A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
A growing body of research now shows that competition, not consolidation, improves school efficiency. By fully exercising Arizona’s existing open enrollment law, school efficiency could rise by 10 percent, achievement could be roughly three to six percentile points higher, and spending could be almost eight percent lower. Expanding Arizona’s charter schools could improve test scores of charter students and students attending nearby traditional public schools by one to three percentile points, while yielding a per-pupil savings of $1,531, over 90 times greater than consolidation’s best-case-scenario savings of $17.34 per-pupil.
Like policymakers in Arizona, policymakers in dozens of other states are weighing the potential savings from projected administrative efficiencies against the potential pitfalls of consolidation. What is the potential fiscal impact of statewide school district consolidation? What other educational quality issues might be affected? This paper examines those questions. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
school (255), district (255), administr (183), student (172), cost (170), consolid (165), educ (103), per (102), state (99), arizona (97), size (90), percent (88), achiev (75), public (74), pupil (73), charter (67), larg (66), 1 (64), save (63), small (62), averag (61), |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Southwestern Political Science Association URL: http://www.swpsa.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Murray, Vicki. "Competition or Consolidation? A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, Fairmont Hotel, Mar 23, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p88989_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Murray, V. , 2005-03-23 "Competition or Consolidation? A Case Study of Arizona’s School District Consolidation Debate" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, Fairmont Hotel Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p88989_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: A growing body of research now shows that competition, not consolidation, improves school efficiency. By fully exercising Arizona’s existing open enrollment law, school efficiency could rise by 10 percent, achievement could be roughly three to six percentile points higher, and spending could be almost eight percent lower. Expanding Arizona’s charter schools could improve test scores of charter students and students attending nearby traditional public schools by one to three percentile points, while yielding a per-pupil savings of $1,531, over 90 times greater than consolidation’s best-case-scenario savings of $17.34 per-pupil.
Like policymakers in Arizona, policymakers in dozens of other states are weighing the potential savings from projected administrative efficiencies against the potential pitfalls of consolidation. What is the potential fiscal impact of statewide school district consolidation? What other educational quality issues might be affected? This paper examines those questions. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
38 |
| Word count: |
19628 |
| Text sample: |
| Competition or Consolidation? A Case Study of Arizona's School District Consolidation Debate Vicki Murray Center for Educational Opportunity Goldwater Institute 500 East Coronado Road Phoenix Arizona 85004 (602) 462-5000 vmurray@goldwaterinstitute.org Revised draft Please do not cite without permission Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association March 24-26 2005 Fairmont Hotel in New Orleans Louisiana. *This paper is a revised version of "Competition or Consolidation? The School District Consolidation Debate Revisited " Vicki Murray and Ross |
| 8 6 141 According to Hoxby "Charter schools are a fledgling reform: they enroll only 1.5 percent of American students. Several states have no charter schools at all and only 7 states and the District of Columbia have more than 2 percent of their students in charter schools." See "Achievement in Charter Schools " 2004 p. 3. On the satisfaction of Arizona parents see Lewis C. Solmon "Findings From the 2002 Survey Of Parents With Children In Arizona Charter |
Similar Titles:
Economies of Size in Florida: School District Size and Student Achievement
The Effects of Funding Education through Fixed Per-Pupil Funding Formulas: Evidence of Resource Inequality between Large and Small Schools
|
|