|
|
|
|
Labor Unions and American Elections: The Politics of Voter Mobilization in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Because of the very low rates of voter participation, relatively small segments of the population can have great influence over elections, if they vote at a high rate. Presidential turnouts in the three elections before 2004 were in the range of 49 to 55 percent of the eligible electorate. Off year national elections have drawn about 36 to 39 percent of the voting age population to the polls. In recent elections, the popular vote for the U.S. House of Representatives has been nearly evenly divided between the two parties (Rimmerman, 2001). Republicans have retained control of the House of Representatives by winning one to two percent more of the popular vote than the Democrats. Because of low voter turnout, the votes of .36 to .72 percent of the eligible electorate can be vital in determining the outcome of elections. At times, the search for a small fraction of the electorate can lead politicians to seek political alliance with very small portions of the American polity (Beachler, 2003).
Because small increases in voter participation can make a substantial difference in election results, interest groups have greater incentives to mobilize their members into the electorate in a polity characterized by very low rates of voter participation. This article presents a case study of organized labor, an interest group that has been losing membership and political influence for decades. In recent elections, labor has attempted to compensate for its reduced numbers by mobilizing its members to go to the polls in greater numbers and to increase the percentage of union members voting for union endorsed candidates. The article investigates labor’s attempt to mobilize its members in a relatively demobilized polity in 2000 and more mobilized polity in 2004. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
union (211), labor (98), vote (89), state (81), percent (76), elect (68), democrat (58), gore (56), 2000 (56), elector (52), polit (49), member (44), voter (44), household (42), new (39), 2004 (36), presidenti (34), republican (34), organ (27), bush (26), turnout (25), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Southwestern Political Science Association URL: http://www.swpsa.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Beachler, Donald. "Labor Unions and American Elections: The Politics of Voter Mobilization in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, Fairmont Hotel, Mar 23, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89012_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Beachler, D. , 2005-03-23 "Labor Unions and American Elections: The Politics of Voter Mobilization in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, Fairmont Hotel Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89012_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Because of the very low rates of voter participation, relatively small segments of the population can have great influence over elections, if they vote at a high rate. Presidential turnouts in the three elections before 2004 were in the range of 49 to 55 percent of the eligible electorate. Off year national elections have drawn about 36 to 39 percent of the voting age population to the polls. In recent elections, the popular vote for the U.S. House of Representatives has been nearly evenly divided between the two parties (Rimmerman, 2001). Republicans have retained control of the House of Representatives by winning one to two percent more of the popular vote than the Democrats. Because of low voter turnout, the votes of .36 to .72 percent of the eligible electorate can be vital in determining the outcome of elections. At times, the search for a small fraction of the electorate can lead politicians to seek political alliance with very small portions of the American polity (Beachler, 2003).
Because small increases in voter participation can make a substantial difference in election results, interest groups have greater incentives to mobilize their members into the electorate in a polity characterized by very low rates of voter participation. This article presents a case study of organized labor, an interest group that has been losing membership and political influence for decades. In recent elections, labor has attempted to compensate for its reduced numbers by mobilizing its members to go to the polls in greater numbers and to increase the percentage of union members voting for union endorsed candidates. The article investigates labor’s attempt to mobilize its members in a relatively demobilized polity in 2000 and more mobilized polity in 2004. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
29 |
| Word count: |
6702 |
| Text sample: |
| Labor Unions and American Elections: The Politics of Voter Mobilization in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections The Politics of Low Turn Out Elections As is well known the politics of the United States is generally characterized by very low rates of voter participation. (Only time will tell if the relatively high voter turnout of 60 percent in 2004 still low by international standards was an anomaly or a new trend.) The causes of this high rate of voter |
| and Richard A. Cloward. 1998. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon. Putnam Robert. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Pantheon Books. Reich Robert. 1998. Locked in the Cabinet. New York: Vintage Books. Rimmerman Craig. 2001. The New Citizenship: Unconventional Politics Activism and Service. Boulder: Westview Press. Safire William. 1995. Before the Fall: An Inside View of the Nixon White House Before Watergate. Garden City: Double Day & Co. Sweeney John. 1996. America |
Similar Titles:
Who Votes? A Comparison of Immigrant Voter Turnout in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections
A District Plan and Proportional Allocation of State Electoral Votes for the 2004 Presidential Election
|
|