All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

English Identity in the Wake of Devolution
Unformatted Document Text:  30 allow the electorate the chance to decide if they wanted a directly-elected mayor. Of these, eleven decided to try out this form of directly-elected devolution. 104 But the reason for Blair to place his unyielding support behind democratically-accountable mayors was due to the success of the very first mayoral devolution referendum held in the city of London in 1998. After the Government published a White Paper entitled “A Mayor and Assembly for London” in March of 1998, the scene was set for a city-wide referendum. 105 The referendum simply asked the London populace if they supported the Government’s policy for a directly-elected Mayor and Assembly for the city. 106 Unlike in Scotland, Londoners were not asked if the Greater London Authority should have the ability to vary the rate of taxation. The referendum took place on May 7, 1998 and the results among those who actually voted were heavily in favor of the proposal. 107 The turnout was a meager 34.6 percent of the electorate, but 72 percent of those who did vote were in favor, while only 28 percent voted against. 108 Overall, despite the low turnout, the referendum proved a massive success for the Labour Government as they were on the path towards devolving directly-accountable power to an area in England rather than in Scotland or Wales. On May 5, 2000, the first ever election of the Mayor and Assembly of the Greater London Authority (GLA) took place. Despite having to run as an independent candidate, the former Mayor of London within the Greater London Council (GLC), which had been 104 Information available from the New Local Government Network think-tank website: http://www.nlgn.org.uk . 105 John Tomaney, “The Governance of London,” in The State and the Nations: The First Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom, ed. Robert Hazell (Thorverton: Imprint Academic, 2000), 247. 106 Ibid., 247. 107 Alexandra Frean, “Race Under Way for a Capital Appointment,” The Times, 8 May 1998. 108 Tomaney, “The Governance of London,” 247.

Authors: Glass, Bryan.
first   previous   Page 30 of 41   next   last



background image
30
allow the electorate the chance to decide if they wanted a directly-elected mayor. Of
these, eleven decided to try out this form of directly-elected devolution.
104
But the reason
for Blair to place his unyielding support behind democratically-accountable mayors was
due to the success of the very first mayoral devolution referendum held in the city of
London in 1998.
After the Government published a White Paper entitled “A Mayor and Assembly
for London” in March of 1998, the scene was set for a city-wide referendum.
105
The
referendum simply asked the London populace if they supported the Government’s
policy for a directly-elected Mayor and Assembly for the city.
106
Unlike in Scotland,
Londoners were not asked if the Greater London Authority should have the ability to vary
the rate of taxation. The referendum took place on May 7, 1998 and the results among
those who actually voted were heavily in favor of the proposal.
107
The turnout was a
meager 34.6 percent of the electorate, but 72 percent of those who did vote were in favor,
while only 28 percent voted against.
108
Overall, despite the low turnout, the referendum
proved a massive success for the Labour Government as they were on the path towards
devolving directly-accountable power to an area in England rather than in Scotland or
Wales.
On May 5, 2000, the first ever election of the Mayor and Assembly of the Greater
London Authority (GLA) took place. Despite having to run as an independent candidate,
the former Mayor of London within the Greater London Council (GLC), which had been
104
Information available from the New Local Government Network think-tank website:
http://www.nlgn.org.uk
.
105
John Tomaney, “The Governance of London,” in The State and the Nations: The First Year of
Devolution in the United Kingdom, ed. Robert Hazell (Thorverton: Imprint Academic, 2000), 247.
106
Ibid., 247.
107
Alexandra Frean, “Race Under Way for a Capital Appointment,” The Times, 8 May 1998.
108
Tomaney, “The Governance of London,” 247.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 30 of 41   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.