12
Table 1 : Percent Female in Tenured/Tenured Track and Total Faculty
Institution
% Total
Female
Rank
% T/TT
Female
Rank
Angelo State University
43.4
16
30.6
16
Lamar University
42.2
17
31.5
13
Midwestern University
41.2
22
31.1
15
Prairie View A&M University
36.2
30
25.2
27
Sam Houston State University
41.4
19
31.2
14
Southwest Texas University
44
13
35.2
7
Stephen F. Austin State University
45.2
10
34
10
Sul Ross State University
34.2
31
25.3
26
Sul Ross Rio Grande
41.7
18
26.3
24
Tarleton State University
41.3
20
26.3
24
Texas A&M University
27.6
34
17.1
33
Texas A&M Commerce
43.8
14
29.3
18
Texas A&M Corpus Christi
48.3
6
34.4
9
Texas A&M Galveston
17.7
35
3.2
35
Texas A&M Int'l
43.8
14
39.2
3
Texas A&M Kingsville
32.9
32
24.1
30
Texas A&M Texarkana
50.7
4
33.8
11
Texas Southern University
45.7
9
38.6
4
Texas Tech
36.5
29
25
28
Texas Woman's University
78
1
68
1
University Houston
38.1
26
24.1
30
University Houston DT
45.9
8
46.4
2
University Houston Victoria
53.3
3
35.7
6
University of Houston Clear Lake
44.7
12
33.8
11
University of North Texas
41.3
20
27.9
22
UT Arlington
38.9
25
23.9
32
UT Austin
36.9
28
24.6
29
UT Brownsville
39.4
23
36.9
5
UT Dallas
28.3
33
15.1
34
UT El Paso
37.9
27
28.2
19
UT Pan American
55.8
2
26.8
23
UT Permian Basin
44.8
11
29.6
17
UT San Antonio
39
24
28.1
20
UT Tyler
49
5
34.5
8
West Texas A&M
47.4
7
28
21
Sources: The Texas Public Universities’ Data and Performance Report issued by the
Texas Education Coordinating Board in June 2002.
.
It is unclear why some very prominent institutions (University of Houston, Texas A&M, and UT
Austin) all fall lower than UTSA in the percent of women represented on the faculty, while other smaller
schools (Stephen F. Austin and Sam Houston) with fewer resources rank higher. UT Austin and the
University of Houston are located in large metropolises, which should be able to provide a greater
Convention