Citation

Presidential Power and the Constitutional Executive

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

This paper explores how best to understand and study presidential powers that are not mentioned in the Constitution but that have nevertheless come to be accepted as legitimate. My particular concern is with executive orders, but my analysis is also relevant for other presidential powers, such as executive agreements and signing statements. My discussion proceeds in four parts. First, I examine what the Constitution says about executive orders and related matters. Since executive orders per se are not mentioned in the Constitution, their constitutional status is largely bound up with the larger issues of the Constitutions treatment of the executive and presidential power. However, I find that these aspects of the Constitution are highly ambiguous. Second, in an attempt to elucidate the matter, I briefly consider related theoretical resources on executive power, particularly John Lockes account of prerogative power, which offers an important rationale for executive orders and similar powers. However, I find that there is a wide variety of relevant theoretical views about executive power and that none decisively resolves the constitutional ambiguities of executive power. Third, I briefly consider related historical sources on the Constitutions treatment of the presidency, particularly English and early American legal and constitutional precedents, but again I find nothing that really settles the issue. Fourth, I conclude with some thoughts about the implications of apparently intractable constitutional ambiguity for analyzing executive orders and their development. Since legal formalism, theoretical arguments, and pre-Constitutional legal precedents do not adequately account for executive orders, the relevant terrain here must be political; given the empirical fact of a persistent plurality of competing conceptions of presidential power, the best way to understand the constitutional propriety of executive orders is to examine how the matter has developed in the political realm, specifically in terms of the interbranch struggle over constitutional politics. For this reason, I conclude that the best methodological approach for this topic is historical institutionalism and American political development.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

execut (252), power (220), constitut (185), presid (115), order (97), may (71), law (59), lock (54), presidenti (52), prerog (48), view (46), polit (42), legisl (40), ambigu (36), american (35), also (33), state (32), claus (30), corwin (29), articl (26), govern (26),

Author's Keywords:

executive order president power Constitution
Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: North Eastern Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.northeasternpsa.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89585_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Dodds, Graham. "Presidential Power and the Constitutional Executive" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North Eastern Political Science Association, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Nov 06, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89585_index.html>

APA Citation:

Dodds, G. , 2003-11-06 "Presidential Power and the Constitutional Executive" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North Eastern Political Science Association, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89585_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: This paper explores how best to understand and study presidential powers that are not mentioned in the Constitution but that have nevertheless come to be accepted as legitimate. My particular concern is with executive orders, but my analysis is also relevant for other presidential powers, such as executive agreements and signing statements. My discussion proceeds in four parts. First, I examine what the Constitution says about executive orders and related matters. Since executive orders per se are not mentioned in the Constitution, their constitutional status is largely bound up with the larger issues of the Constitutions treatment of the executive and presidential power. However, I find that these aspects of the Constitution are highly ambiguous. Second, in an attempt to elucidate the matter, I briefly consider related theoretical resources on executive power, particularly John Lockes account of prerogative power, which offers an important rationale for executive orders and similar powers. However, I find that there is a wide variety of relevant theoretical views about executive power and that none decisively resolves the constitutional ambiguities of executive power. Third, I briefly consider related historical sources on the Constitutions treatment of the presidency, particularly English and early American legal and constitutional precedents, but again I find nothing that really settles the issue. Fourth, I conclude with some thoughts about the implications of apparently intractable constitutional ambiguity for analyzing executive orders and their development. Since legal formalism, theoretical arguments, and pre-Constitutional legal precedents do not adequately account for executive orders, the relevant terrain here must be political; given the empirical fact of a persistent plurality of competing conceptions of presidential power, the best way to understand the constitutional propriety of executive orders is to examine how the matter has developed in the political realm, specifically in terms of the interbranch struggle over constitutional politics. For this reason, I conclude that the best methodological approach for this topic is historical institutionalism and American political development.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Associated Document Available North Eastern Political Science Association

Document Type: .PDF
Page count: 23
Word count: 12632
Text sample:
The Constitutional Executive and the Ambiguity of Presidential Power. Graham G. Dodds Research Fellow Governance Studies Program The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington DC 20036 202-797-6061 gdodds@brookings.edu Paper for delivery at the 2003 meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association. Philadelphia PA. November 6-8 2003. This paper is a work in progress. Please do not quote without permission. ABSTRACT: This paper explores how best to understand and study presidential powers that are not mentioned in the Constitution
Clinton. The American Presidency. 1956. [Also 2nd ed. Time Inc. 1963.] Scigliano Robert. “The President’s Prerogative Power.” [Chapter in: Cronin Thomas. Inventing the Presidency. Kansas 1989.] Shaw Malcolm. The Modern Presidency. Harper & Row 1987. Sheffer Martin S. “The Continued Need for the Prerogative Presidency.” White House Studies. Volume 2 Number 3. 2002. pp251-269. Sheffer Martin S. “Presidential Power and Limited Government.” Presidential Studies Quarterly. Summer 1991. v21 n3. Spitzer Robert J. President and Congress. Temple 1993. Tugwell Rexford


Similar Titles:
Cabinet Politics and Presidential Power: The transformations of executive governance in American political development

Executive Orders in American Political and Constitutional Development

Power and Politics in the Classroom: One-Session Legislative Simulations in Introductory American Government Classes


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.