All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

District-Level Relative Vote: The Role of Elections in Presidential Success in Congress
Unformatted Document Text:  1 Political science continues to struggle to explain what makes Presidents successful. The largest challenge is simply defining presidential success: a handful of presidents meet the ‘you will know a successful President when you see them’ standard, but finding a more objective definition of success is extremely difficult. The grand historical question of who has been a successful president rests on many criteria. However for most studies, including this one, the search for an objective measure of presidential success quickly narrows to the legislative arena because this offers one of the few opportunities to quantify Presidential actions that cover a wide range of political issues. Since Richard Neustadt’s seminal book Presidential Power (1960) , the literature on Congressional support for the President’s legislative positions has focused on four linkage agents between the president and Congress: 1) presidential skill and prestige; 2) public approval of the President; 3) political parties; 4) political ideologies (e.g. Bond and Fleisher 1990; Bond and Fleisher 2000; Edwards 1989; Edwards and Barrett 2000; Jones 1994; Kernell 1997; Peterson 1990). Recent research has concluded that the skills and prestige that Neustadt thought were so important in the mid-20 th Century Presidency have either been made obsolete by changes in the Washington community over the successive decades (Kernell 1997) or were never as important as Neustadt supposed (Bond and Fleisher 1990; Edwards 1989; Jones 1994; Peterson 1990; Skowronek 1993), leaving the last three linkages as the primary explanations for support for the President’s legislative positions in Congress in the current literature. The remaining list of linkages – co-partisanship, ideology and public approval – overlook the way concurrent elections link members of Congress and the President. As George Edwards has posed “…the essential question: What difference do presidential elections make? What is their impact on support for the winner’s program in Congress?” (1989, p144)

Authors: Mann, Christopher.
first   previous   Page 2 of 32   next   last



background image
1
Political science continues to struggle to explain what makes Presidents successful. The
largest challenge is simply defining presidential success: a handful of presidents meet the ‘you
will know a successful President when you see them’ standard, but finding a more objective
definition of success is extremely difficult. The grand historical question of who has been a
successful president rests on many criteria. However for most studies, including this one, the
search for an objective measure of presidential success quickly narrows to the legislative arena
because this offers one of the few opportunities to quantify Presidential actions that cover a
wide range of political issues.
Since Richard Neustadt’s seminal book
Presidential Power
(1960)
,
the literature on
Congressional support for the President’s legislative positions has focused on four linkage
agents between the president and Congress: 1) presidential skill and prestige; 2) public
approval of the President; 3) political parties; 4) political ideologies (e.g. Bond and Fleisher
1990; Bond and Fleisher 2000; Edwards 1989; Edwards and Barrett 2000; Jones 1994; Kernell
1997; Peterson 1990). Recent research has concluded that the skills and prestige that Neustadt
thought were so important in the mid-20
th
Century Presidency have either been made obsolete
by changes in the Washington community over the successive decades (Kernell 1997) or were
never as important as Neustadt supposed (Bond and Fleisher 1990; Edwards 1989; Jones 1994;
Peterson 1990; Skowronek 1993), leaving the last three linkages as the primary explanations
for support for the President’s legislative positions in Congress in the current literature.
The remaining list of linkages – co-partisanship, ideology and public approval – overlook
the way concurrent elections link members of Congress and the President. As George Edwards
has posed “…the essential question: What difference do presidential elections make? What is
their impact on support for the winner’s program in Congress?” (1989, p144)


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 32   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.