All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

What Is Original about Kant's Original Contract?
Unformatted Document Text:  12 have already done, a past act that now obligates us to obedience in the future. But to posit such an act is necessarily to posit a prior reason for the act, and as we have already seen with Hobbes and Locke, it is difficult if not impossible for this reason, and not the act of contract itself, from becoming the real justification for our obedience. The originality of Kant’s appeal to the original contract is that government is not conceived as the result of a founding act for which we can or should recover the reasons. Instead, the continued existence of government is reconciled with the normative idea of Recht by our demanding, at every moment, a universal form of political justification. The contract does not look back to a citizen’s prior act; rather, in committing himself or herself to the contract, the citizen looks forward to a time in which laws are given full justification. That thought may seem an unreachable ideal, but the Kantian conception of modern political agency, the possibility of politics in Kant’s sense, gives a coherent picture of how we might all make the law. If we are asked why we should obey the law, and we answer that we have made a contract, what we mean by that is that a law is not supposed to be just the will of any particular individual. Even if we disagree with the law, we cannot simply refuse to obey, because this would reduce the commonwealth to a series of individual wills, where it is supposed to be the product of commonwealth. If we disagree with the law, the legitimate response is not disobedience but politics: the raising of a public claim with which we expect others to agree and with which we expect authority to comply. In that case, we rule together, but if we abandon politics for despotism or sheer resistance, we rule and are ruled alone. Whatever anyone has done in the past, our goal ought to be to rule together in the future. And it is because we are committed to ruling together that it is entirely appropriate for us to say, and to say only, that we obey the law because we have made a contract.

Authors: Krasnoff, Larry.
first   previous   Page 12 of 12   next   last



background image
12
have already done, a past act that now obligates us to obedience in the future. But to posit such
an act is necessarily to posit a prior reason for the act, and as we have already seen with Hobbes
and Locke, it is difficult if not impossible for this reason, and not the act of contract itself, from
becoming the real justification for our obedience. The originality of Kant’s appeal to the original
contract is that government is not conceived as the result of a founding act for which we can or
should recover the reasons. Instead, the continued existence of government is reconciled with
the normative idea of Recht by our demanding, at every moment, a universal form of political
justification. The contract does not look back to a citizen’s prior act; rather, in committing
himself or herself to the contract, the citizen looks forward to a time in which laws are given full
justification. That thought may seem an unreachable ideal, but the Kantian conception of
modern political agency, the possibility of politics in Kant’s sense, gives a coherent picture of
how we might all make the law. If we are asked why we should obey the law, and we answer
that we have made a contract, what we mean by that is that a law is not supposed to be just the
will of any particular individual. Even if we disagree with the law, we cannot simply refuse to
obey, because this would reduce the commonwealth to a series of individual wills, where it is
supposed to be the product of commonwealth. If we disagree with the law, the legitimate
response is not disobedience but politics: the raising of a public claim with which we expect
others to agree and with which we expect authority to comply. In that case, we rule together, but
if we abandon politics for despotism or sheer resistance, we rule and are ruled alone. Whatever
anyone has done in the past, our goal ought to be to rule together in the future. And it is because
we are committed to ruling together that it is entirely appropriate for us to say, and to say only,
that we obey the law because we have made a contract.


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 12 of 12   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.