All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Voting Rights for Resident Aliens: A Comparison of 25 Democracies
Unformatted Document Text:  David C. Earnest, Voting Rights for Resident Aliens -- 2 pursued innovative approaches to incorporate these resident aliens into their polities. Sending states have expanded the use of the absentee ballot, have created overseas legislative districts, and even encouraged their émigrés to hold multiple citizenships simultaneously-- a significant reversal of past practice that runs counter to established international law. Host states by contrasted have adopted one of the more surprising and innovative practices to incorporate resident aliens into the political life of their societies. Since 1960, twenty-three democracies have created voting rights for resident aliens, while several others have considered but rejected such rights (Rath 1990, Earnest 2003). Taken together, these innovative practices have led some political scientists to argue that states are separating the institution of citizenship both from its territorial basis and from the body of rights it traditionally has embodied. For this reason, researchers have focused on the politics of citizenship as an approach to broader questions of the historical evolution of state sovereignty, citizenship, democratic norms, and the global human rights regime. This paper seeks to contribute to the debate between what some scholars have called the “nationalist” and “postnationalist” theses of citizenship politics (see inter alia Koopmans and Statham 1999; Aleinikoff 2000 and 2001; Galloway 2001; Gerstle and Mollenkopf 2001; Kondo 2001; and Aleinikoff and Klusmeyer 2002). In brief, both theses seek to explain the state’s practices for the constitution of its political community, but each locates the causes of the state’s policies at different levels of analysis. As the labels “nationalist” and “postnationalist” suggest, furthermore, the two theses diverge on the implications of contemporary citizenship politics in democracies for our understanding of how global flows of migrants and norms may affect the institution of sovereignty. Using voting rights for resident

Authors: Earnest, David.
first   previous   Page 3 of 42   next   last



background image
David C. Earnest, Voting Rights for Resident Aliens -- 2
pursued innovative approaches to incorporate these resident aliens into
their polities. Sending states have expanded the use of the absentee
ballot, have created overseas legislative districts, and even
encouraged their émigrés to hold multiple citizenships simultaneously--
a significant reversal of past practice that runs counter to
established international law. Host states by contrasted have adopted
one of the more surprising and innovative practices to incorporate
resident aliens into the political life of their societies. Since 1960,
twenty-three democracies have created voting rights for resident
aliens, while several others have considered but rejected such rights
(Rath 1990, Earnest 2003). Taken together, these innovative practices
have led some political scientists to argue that states are separating
the institution of citizenship both from its territorial basis and from
the body of rights it traditionally has embodied. For this reason,
researchers have focused on the politics of citizenship as an approach
to broader questions of the historical evolution of state sovereignty,
citizenship, democratic norms, and the global human rights regime.
This paper seeks to contribute to the debate between what some
scholars have called the “nationalist” and “postnationalist” theses of
citizenship politics (see inter alia Koopmans and Statham 1999;
Aleinikoff 2000 and 2001; Galloway 2001; Gerstle and Mollenkopf 2001;
Kondo 2001; and Aleinikoff and Klusmeyer 2002). In brief, both theses
seek to explain the state’s practices for the constitution of its
political community, but each locates the causes of the state’s
policies at different levels of analysis. As the labels “nationalist”
and “postnationalist” suggest, furthermore, the two theses diverge on
the implications of contemporary citizenship politics in democracies
for our understanding of how global flows of migrants and norms may
affect the institution of sovereignty. Using voting rights for resident


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 42   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.