All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Support for National and Supranational Institutions in Europe
Unformatted Document Text:  [18] Inglehart, Ronald, Jacques-Rene Rabier and Karlheinz Reif. 1991. “The Evolution of Public Attitudes toward European Integration: 1970-1986.” In Eurobarometer: The Dynamics of European Public Opin- ion, ed. K. Reif and R. Inglehart. London: Macmillan. [19] Janssen, Joseph I. 1991. “Postmaterialism, Cognitive Mobilization and Public Support for European Integration.” British Journal of Political Science 21: 443-468. [20] Joreskog, Karl and Dag Sorbom. 2003. Lisrel 8.54. Scientific Software International, Inc. [21] Krosnick, Jon A. and Duane F. Alwin. 1987. “An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 201-219. [22] Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Pres. [23] Mishler, William and Richard Rose. 1997. “Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies.” Journal of Politics 59: 418-451. [24] Ostrom, Elinor and Sue Craford. 1999. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 89: 582-600. [25] Popkin, Samuel L. and Michael A. Dimock. 2000. “Knowledge, Trust, and International Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality ed. Arthur Lupia, Matthew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. New York: Cambridge University Press. [26] Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley- Interscience. [27] Rohrschneider, Robert. 2002. “The Democracy Deficit and Support for an EU-Wide Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 463-475. [28] Sanchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. 2000. “The Political Basis of Support for European Integration.” European Union Politics 1: 147-171. [29] Sudman, Seymour, Norman M. Bradburn and Norbert Schwartz. 1996. Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 22

Authors: Albright, Jeremy.
first   previous   Page 22 of 22   next   last



background image
[18] Inglehart, Ronald, Jacques-Rene Rabier and Karlheinz Reif. 1991. “The Evolution of Public Attitudes
toward European Integration: 1970-1986.” In Eurobarometer: The Dynamics of European Public Opin-
ion, ed. K. Reif and R. Inglehart. London: Macmillan.
[19] Janssen, Joseph I. 1991. “Postmaterialism, Cognitive Mobilization and Public Support for European
Integration.” British Journal of Political Science 21: 443-468.
[20] Joreskog, Karl and Dag Sorbom. 2003. Lisrel 8.54. Scientific Software International, Inc.
[21] Krosnick, Jon A. and Duane F. Alwin. 1987. “An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order
Effects in Survey Measurement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 201-219.
[22] Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Pres.
[23] Mishler, William and Richard Rose. 1997. “Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil
and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies.” Journal of Politics 59: 418-451.
[24] Ostrom, Elinor and Sue Craford. 1999. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review
89: 582-600.
[25] Popkin, Samuel L. and Michael A. Dimock. 2000. “Knowledge, Trust, and International Reasoning.” In
Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality ed. Arthur Lupia, Matthew D.
McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[26] Przeworski, Adam and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-
Interscience.
[27] Rohrschneider, Robert. 2002. “The Democracy Deficit and Support for an EU-Wide Government.”
American Journal of Political Science 46: 463-475.
[28] Sanchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. 2000. “The Political Basis of Support for European Integration.” European
Union Politics 1: 147-171.
[29] Sudman, Seymour, Norman M. Bradburn and Norbert Schwartz. 1996. Thinking about Answers: The
Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
22


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 22 of 22   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.