|
|
|
|
Concepts, Crisis, and Campaigns: How Political Professionals Perceive and Respond to Electoral Crisis |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper broadens the dialogue about campaign crises by asking how political professionals—especially political consultants—conceptualize and define campaign crises. The paper enhances our understanding of congressional campaign politics primarily on two fronts. First, rather than treating campaign crises as a dichotomous, independent variable, I allow the political professionals who combat campaign crises to define what the term means in a practical sense, which sheds light on academic constructs of campaign crises and related concepts. Second, I examine campaign crises from an internal perspective by exploring how campaign professionals perceive campaign crises and react to those crises within the campaign. This approach marks a departure from existing scholarly work, which focuses mainly on external outcomes, such as the mere presence of crisis (usually operationalized as “scandals”) and the impact on fundraising and vote margin. The data demonstrate that political professionals view campaign crises as complex, interactive events. Although popular and scholarly wisdom focus on campaign scandals as key variables in congressional elections, the data presented here show that political professionals classify a range of behavior and events beyond “scandals” as campaign crises. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
campaign (255), crise (181), polit (163), consult (103), interview (94), scandal (91), profession (86), crisi (86), subject (52), candid (48), frame (42), elect (39), data (39), garrett (39), 1 (36), congression (35), respons (29), defin (28), howev (28), import (28), event (26), |
Author's Keywords:
|
campaign crises, scandals, congressional elections, congressional campaigns, political professionals, political consultants |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: North Eastern Political Science Association URL: http://www.northeasternpsa.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Garrett, R.. "Concepts, Crisis, and Campaigns: How Political Professionals Perceive and Respond to Electoral Crisis" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North Eastern Political Science Association, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Nov 06, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89831_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Garrett, R. S. , 2003-11-06 "Concepts, Crisis, and Campaigns: How Political Professionals Perceive and Respond to Electoral Crisis" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North Eastern Political Science Association, Crowne Plaza Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89831_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper broadens the dialogue about campaign crises by asking how political professionals—especially political consultants—conceptualize and define campaign crises. The paper enhances our understanding of congressional campaign politics primarily on two fronts. First, rather than treating campaign crises as a dichotomous, independent variable, I allow the political professionals who combat campaign crises to define what the term means in a practical sense, which sheds light on academic constructs of campaign crises and related concepts. Second, I examine campaign crises from an internal perspective by exploring how campaign professionals perceive campaign crises and react to those crises within the campaign. This approach marks a departure from existing scholarly work, which focuses mainly on external outcomes, such as the mere presence of crisis (usually operationalized as “scandals”) and the impact on fundraising and vote margin. The data demonstrate that political professionals view campaign crises as complex, interactive events. Although popular and scholarly wisdom focus on campaign scandals as key variables in congressional elections, the data presented here show that political professionals classify a range of behavior and events beyond “scandals” as campaign crises. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
37 |
| Word count: |
10724 |
| Text sample: |
| Concepts Crises and Campaigns: How Political Professionals Conceptualize and Define Electoral Crisis R. Sam Garrett Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies American University 4400 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington DC 200168130 (202) 8856295 samg@american.edu Prepared for presentation at the Symposium on ``Political Campaigning and Elections: Organization Consultants and Issues '' held in conjunction with the annual meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association Philadelphia. November 68 2003. This research is supported in part by the Improving Campaign Conduct project sponsored |
| or cause surprise in the campaign. Source: author coding. Note: All codes refer to data provided in response to interview Question 1. Garrett 36 TABLE 2 Frequency of Interview Subjects' Conceptualizations of Campaign Crises (Question 1) Rank Frame N Valid Percentage 1 Candidate Created 13 50.0 2 Disruption 12 46.2 3 Surprise 10 38.5 4 Attack 8 30.8 5 Organization 7 26.9 6 Strategy 6 23.1 7 a False Concept 5 19.2 7 a Routine 5 19.2 8 a |
Similar Titles:
Political Consultants and U.S.
House of Representatives Elections of 2002: Strategic Decision-making
and the Timing of Campaign Expenditures for Consultant
Services
Is Paying for Political Consultants an Efficient Use of Campaign Funds in U.S. House Elections?
Campaign Interestingness: Political Events, Candid Photographs, and Backstage Behaviors
|
|