All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

What Should We Do? Inviting New Groups of Students into Theory through Action
Unformatted Document Text:  Arendt is clear in her condemnation of Eichmann and her discontent with the verdict. The ending of her trial report is unexpected. Arendt finds it necessary to create her own more adequate judgment of Eichmann in the final pages of her epilogue. This commentary was necessary, in her opinion, because the judges had misunderstood the nature of Eichmann as a criminal as well as the nature of his crime. In the words of our class, Arendt believed that the court had failed to make sense of Eichmann as an actor and to make sense of his crime as actions. Where the jury had been looking for malicious intent, Arendt saw the failure to understand crime in the context of totalitarianism. “Foremost among the larger issues at stake in the Eichmann trial was the assumption current in all modern legal systems that intent to do wrong is necessary for the commission of a crime.” (Eichmann in Jerusalem, 277) The judges and the prosecutor had been looking for a preconceived form of intent, the absence of which had complicated their interpretation of Eichmann’s case, although it’s abundantly clear in the trial report that Eichmann had been found guilty before the trial ever began. The closing of Arendt’s proposed verdict shifts the focus from intent to the question of obedience. If Eichmann had consciously obeyed, he was guilty. “For politics is not like the nursery; in politics obedience and support are the same.” (Eichmann in Jerusalem, 279) The potential of committing a crime without intent troubled students deeply. This insight politicized their everyday taken-for-granted actions. The familiar and the habitual, the routine and the procedural, all might be the beginnings of catastrophe. As much as they were horrified by Eichmann, they were also sympathetic to the nature of everyday life in which people focus on their own careers, their own families, and their own interests. Arendt’s equation of obedience and support seemed unacceptable to some, but to others, that equation expressed the dangers of careerism and conformism. 19

Authors: Haddad, Khristina.
first   previous   Page 19 of 23   next   last



background image
Arendt is clear in her condemnation of Eichmann and her discontent with the
verdict. The ending of her trial report is unexpected. Arendt finds it necessary to create
her own more adequate judgment of Eichmann in the final pages of her epilogue. This
commentary was necessary, in her opinion, because the judges had misunderstood the
nature of Eichmann as a criminal as well as the nature of his crime. In the words of our
class, Arendt believed that the court had failed to make sense of Eichmann as an actor
and to make sense of his crime as actions. Where the jury had been looking for malicious
intent, Arendt saw the failure to understand crime in the context of totalitarianism.
“Foremost among the larger issues at stake in the Eichmann trial was the assumption
current in all modern legal systems that intent to do wrong is necessary for the
commission of a crime.” (Eichmann in Jerusalem, 277) The judges and the prosecutor
had been looking for a preconceived form of intent, the absence of which had
complicated their interpretation of Eichmann’s case, although it’s abundantly clear in the
trial report that Eichmann had been found guilty before the trial ever began. The closing
of Arendt’s proposed verdict shifts the focus from intent to the question of obedience. If
Eichmann had consciously obeyed, he was guilty. “For politics is not like the nursery; in
politics obedience and support are the same.” (Eichmann in Jerusalem, 279)
The potential of committing a crime without intent troubled students deeply. This
insight politicized their everyday taken-for-granted actions. The familiar and the
habitual, the routine and the procedural, all might be the beginnings of catastrophe. As
much as they were horrified by Eichmann, they were also sympathetic to the nature of
everyday life in which people focus on their own careers, their own families, and their
own interests. Arendt’s equation of obedience and support seemed unacceptable to some,
but to others, that equation expressed the dangers of careerism and conformism.
19


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 23   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.