All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

A Choice Model of Status and Fertility
Unformatted Document Text:  component will be smaller in magnitude: -(1-½) 2 = -.25. The value of the status component will be identical, -.25, whenever a person’s own status matches his or her background status. Finally, if the person’s background status is minimal (B = 0) and he or she manages to attain the highest possible status (S = 1), the status component will be of the smallest possible magnitude, 0, connoting maximal satisfaction. We use our assumption that investment in status is investment not in fertility to create a simple model for fertility: F = 1 - λI. (2) The parameter λ indicates the tradeoff between investment in status and investment in fertility, 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1. For modern women, we take the tradeoff to be complete: we take λ to be 1. We introduce λ to compare men and women, for we assume that for men there is less of a tradeoff, that investment in status can have some payoff in fertility. Thus, for men, λ < 1. Our model for the relationship between investment in status and status is more complicated because background status also plays a role. We assumed the relationship to be linear, such that to maintain a person’s background status, he or she would have to put in a investment equal to that status, with model parameter R (0 ≤ R ≤ 1) giving the slope of the effect of excessive or deficient investment. R also can be seen as the proportional size of the range over which personal status can vary. This model is: S = B + R(I – B). (3) If R = 1 in eqn. 3, then background status plays no role in determining a person’s own status; own status is determined entirely by investment in status. We expect, however, that background status has a positive effect on a person’s own status, which is conveyed by eqn. 3 when R < 1, and is increasingly true as R decreases toward 0. 4

Authors: Hopcroft, Rosemary. and Whitmeyer, Joseph.
first   previous   Page 6 of 18   next   last



background image
component will be smaller in magnitude: -(1-½)
2
= -.25. The value of the status
component will be identical, -.25, whenever a person’s own status matches his or her
background status. Finally, if the person’s background status is minimal (B = 0) and he
or she manages to attain the highest possible status (S = 1), the status component will be
of the smallest possible magnitude, 0, connoting maximal satisfaction.
We use our assumption that investment in status is investment not in fertility to
create a simple model for fertility:
F = 1 - λI.
(2)
The parameter λ indicates the tradeoff between investment in status and investment in
fertility, 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1. For modern women, we take the tradeoff to be complete: we take λ to
be 1. We introduce λ to compare men and women, for we assume that for men there is
less of a tradeoff, that investment in status can have some payoff in fertility. Thus, for
men, λ < 1.
Our model for the relationship between investment in status and status is more
complicated because background status also plays a role. We assumed the relationship to
be linear, such that to maintain a person’s background status, he or she would have to put
in a investment equal to that status, with model parameter R (0 ≤ R ≤ 1) giving the slope
of the effect of excessive or deficient investment. R also can be seen as the proportional
size of the range over which personal status can vary. This model is:
S = B + R(IB).
(3)
If R = 1 in eqn. 3, then background status plays no role in determining a person’s own
status; own status is determined entirely by investment in status. We expect, however,
that background status has a positive effect on a person’s own status, which is conveyed
by eqn. 3 when R < 1, and is increasingly true as R decreases toward 0.
4


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 6 of 18   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.