 |
Online Privacy as Legal Safeguard: The Relationship Among Consumer, Online Portal, and Privacy Policies
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Elgesem, Dag. (1996). Privacy, respect for persons, and risk. In Ess, Charles (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. Albany: State University of New York Press, 45-66. Fairclough, N. (2000). Critical analysis of media discourse. In P. Marris & S. Thornham (Eds.), Media
Studies: A Reader, 2
nd
Edition, (pp. 308-325). New York: NYU Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold. Fox, Susannah & Lewis, Oliver. (2001, April 2). Fear of online crime: Americans support FBI interception of criminal suspects’ email and new laws to protect online privacy. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org. Gillis, Cydney. (2002, May 16). Soft talk: Hotmail pushes for revenue. Eastside Journal,http://www.eastsidejournal.com/92560.html. Hamelink, Cees, J. (2000). The ethics of cyberspace. London: Sage. Kandra, Anne. (2001, July). The myth of secure e-shopping. PC World, 19(7), 29-32. Reagle, Joseph, & Cranor, Lorrie Faith. (1999, February). The platform for privacy preferences. Communications of the ACM, 42(2), 48-55. van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social
Interaction (pp. 1-37). London: Sage.
|
| | Authors: Fernback, Jan. and Papacharissi, Zizi. |
|
| |
|
|
Elgesem, Dag. (1996). Privacy, respect for persons, and risk. In Ess, Charles (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. Albany: State University of New York Press, 45-66. Fairclough, N. (2000). Critical analysis of media discourse. In P. Marris & S. Thornham (Eds.), Media
Studies: A Reader, 2
nd
Edition, (pp. 308-325). New York: NYU Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold. Fox, Susannah & Lewis, Oliver. (2001, April 2). Fear of online crime: Americans support FBI interception of criminal suspects’ email and new laws to protect online privacy. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org. Gillis, Cydney. (2002, May 16). Soft talk: Hotmail pushes for revenue. Eastside Journal, http://www.eastsidejournal.com/92560.html. Hamelink, Cees, J. (2000). The ethics of cyberspace. London: Sage. Kandra, Anne. (2001, July). The myth of secure e-shopping. PC World, 19(7), 29-32. Reagle, Joseph, & Cranor, Lorrie Faith. (1999, February). The platform for privacy preferences. Communications of the ACM, 42(2), 48-55. van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social
Interaction (pp. 1-37). London: Sage.
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|