|
|
|
|
Effects of Target, Topic, and Time on Disclosure in an Online Breast Cancer Support Group |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
For participants in an asynchronous online breast cancer support group (n=82), two months of messages were sampled and coded for target, general disclosure, and four disclosure attributes: ego-relevance, positive and negative affect, and cancer topic. A subset of messages was coded for social support.
While general disclosure declined between months 1 and 2, emotional support increased. These changes were associated with a shift in primary message target from the group to individuals, suggesting that group participation addressed different needs over time.
Contrary to typical expectations during relationship development, disclosure attributes did not increase over time. In addition, attributes were higher in messages to the group rather than to individuals, suggesting a possible therapeutic role for group messages. Disclosure ego-relevance, positive affect, and negative affect were limited to messages about cancer, suggesting a high specific utility of the group to its users. Women who dropped out may have either had a lesser need to disclose or may have chosen an ineffective disclosure strategy. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
disclosur (196), messag (166), target (142), group (113), support (81), month (81), cancer (78), may (68), particip (60), high (57), affect (48), individu (48), time (46), social (46), communic (45), 1 (43), relationship (42), multipl (41), differ (41), women (41), level (41), |
Author's Keywords:
|
computer-mediated communication, online support group, disclosure, breast cancer, intimacy, emotion, affect, social support |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Communication Association URL: http://www.icahdq.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Liebhart, Janice., Pingree, Suzanne., Hawkins, Robert., McTavish, Fiona. and Gustafson, David. "Effects of Target, Topic, and Time on Disclosure in an Online Breast Cancer Support Group" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott Hotel, San Diego, CA, May 27, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p111419_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Liebhart, J. L., Pingree, S. , Hawkins, R. , McTavish, F. and Gustafson, D. H. , 2003-05-27 "Effects of Target, Topic, and Time on Disclosure in an Online Breast Cancer Support Group" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott Hotel, San Diego, CA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p111419_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: For participants in an asynchronous online breast cancer support group (n=82), two months of messages were sampled and coded for target, general disclosure, and four disclosure attributes: ego-relevance, positive and negative affect, and cancer topic. A subset of messages was coded for social support.
While general disclosure declined between months 1 and 2, emotional support increased. These changes were associated with a shift in primary message target from the group to individuals, suggesting that group participation addressed different needs over time.
Contrary to typical expectations during relationship development, disclosure attributes did not increase over time. In addition, attributes were higher in messages to the group rather than to individuals, suggesting a possible therapeutic role for group messages. Disclosure ego-relevance, positive affect, and negative affect were limited to messages about cancer, suggesting a high specific utility of the group to its users. Women who dropped out may have either had a lesser need to disclose or may have chosen an ineffective disclosure strategy. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
37 |
| Word count: |
9623 |
| Text sample: |
| Effects of Target Topic and Time on Disclosure in an Online Breast Cancer Support Group Abstract For participants in an asynchronous online breast cancer support group (n=82) two months of messages were sampled and coded for target general disclosure and four disclosure attributes: ego-relevance positive and negative affect and cancer topic. A subset of messages was coded for social support. General disclosure declined between months while emotional support increased. Both changes were associated with a shift in primary message |
| 45 34.2 (30.0) 3.18*** to multiple targets 30 18.3 (0) 45 41.2 (40.0) 2.87** to single targets 10 41.0 (30.0) 31 28.2 (20.0) .42 Cancer topic2 to either target 35 53.0 (60.0) 45 76.1 (75.0) 1.89# to multiple targets 30 53.9 (58.3) 45 81.7 (100) 2.58** to single targets 10 88.2 (100) 31 70.5 (66.7) 2.10* # p ≤.10; * p≤.05; ** p≤ .01; ***p≤.001 a Percent messages to multiple targets = 100% - percent messages to single targets |
Similar Titles:
What Women Know and Feel about Social Support that Men Don't: Two Tests of a Dual-Process Approach to Explaining Sex Differences in Responses to Supportive Messages
Social Capital and Political Participation in America: An Individual or Group Level Relationship?
|
|