All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Effects of Target, Topic, and Time on Disclosure in an Online Breast Cancer Support Group
Unformatted Document Text:  2 group known to be disproportionate users of both face-to-face and online support groups (Davison, et al., 2000). Disclosure dimensions are then used to provide clues about the likely communication and relational processes occurring within this context. Role of disclosure in relationships In early work on disclosure, Jourard (1971) noted individuals could neither love nor be loved in the absence of disclosure. However, sharing personal information also rendered communicators vulnerable to their targets. The idea that disclosure could be either personally beneficial or costly was also integral to Social Penetration Theory (Altman & Taylor, 1973), which postulated that relationships only deepen if both people take repeated risks and gradually increase the intimacy level and breadth of topics they disclose to one another. While many tenets of this proposed role of disclosure in relationship development have been supported over the years, the theory has been repeatedly qualified. The levels of both shared emotions and intimate facts do appear to increase between interaction partners over time (Cozby, 1973; Dindia, 1994). Both marital partners and friends typically exchange a higher level of private facts and emotions compared with strangers (Morton, 1978; Dindia et al., 1997). Also, expressing strong feelings in the absence of a highly private topic may not necessarily convey a high level of intimacy, but these disclosures may provide a safer, intermediate step to intimacy in developing relationships (Morton, 1978). It appears that relationship development may be partly driven by an observed social norm to reciprocate the depth (Dindia, 2000) and possibly also the level of emotion (Bradac et al., 1978) contained in disclosures. In addition, disclosure generally also promote liking. People report being more attracted to strangers who use more intimate levels of disclosure with them (Berg & Archer, 1983; Collins & Miller, 1994). Also, subjects disclose more intimate details of their lives to strangers who they like

Authors: Liebhart, Janice., Pingree, Suzanne., Hawkins, Robert., McTavish, Fiona. and Gustafson, David.
first   previous   Page 3 of 37   next   last



background image
2
group known to be disproportionate users of both face-to-face and online support groups
(Davison, et al., 2000). Disclosure dimensions are then used to provide clues about the
likely communication and relational processes occurring within this context.
Role of disclosure in relationships
In early work on disclosure, Jourard (1971) noted individuals could neither love
nor be loved in the absence of disclosure. However, sharing personal information also
rendered communicators vulnerable to their targets. The idea that disclosure could be
either personally beneficial or costly was also integral to Social Penetration Theory
(Altman & Taylor, 1973), which postulated that relationships only deepen if both people
take repeated risks and gradually increase the intimacy level and breadth of topics they
disclose to one another.
While many tenets of this proposed role of disclosure in relationship development
have been supported over the years, the theory has been repeatedly qualified. The
levels of both shared emotions and intimate facts do appear to increase between
interaction partners over time (Cozby, 1973; Dindia, 1994). Both marital partners and
friends typically exchange a higher level of private facts and emotions compared with
strangers (Morton, 1978; Dindia et al., 1997). Also, expressing strong feelings in the
absence of a highly private topic may not necessarily convey a high level of intimacy, but
these disclosures may provide a safer, intermediate step to intimacy in developing
relationships (Morton, 1978).
It appears that relationship development may be partly driven by an observed
social norm to reciprocate the depth (Dindia, 2000) and possibly also the level of
emotion (Bradac et al., 1978) contained in disclosures. In addition, disclosure generally
also promote liking. People report being more attracted to strangers who use more
intimate levels of disclosure with them (Berg & Archer, 1983; Collins & Miller, 1994).
Also, subjects disclose more intimate details of their lives to strangers who they like


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 37   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.