All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Cervical Cancer Messages in Women’s Magazines: A Content Analysis Grounded in the Extended Parallel Process Model
Unformatted Document Text:  Cervical Cancer 35 Table 1 Results Assessing the Amount of Severity, Susceptibility, Self-efficacy, and Response-efficacy Messages in the Six Women’s Magazines Analyzed Severity Susceptibility Self-efficacy Response-efficacy Cosmopolitan (n = 26) 2.73 (4.45) a 3.35 (3.61) b 1.27 (2.13) b 2.08 (2.30) c Mademoiselle (n = 4) 0.25 (0.50) a 2.75 (2.20) b 1.00 (0.82) c 0.50 (0.58) d Glamour (n = 13) 19.69 (36.41) a 5.15 (5.23) b 0.69 (1.18) b 4.46 (10.37) c Woman’s Day (n = 6) 7.67 (7.79) a 7.50 (8.36) b 2.50 (3.21) c 8.00 (5.06) c Ladies’ Home Journal (n = 8) 15.88 (13.76) a 10.13 (6.06) b 4.00 (3.59) abc 9.00 (5.86) c Good Housekeeping (n = 23) 1.48 (2.29) a 0.65 (0.83) b 0.43 (0.66) ac 2.61 (3.60) bc Note. Numbers outside the parentheses represent mean number of mentions of each category across articles in the six individual magazines. Numbers inside the parentheses represent standard deviations. Sample size n represents the number of analyzed articles in each magazine. Means in the same row with the same subscript and no asterisk are significantly different at the p < .01 level.

Authors: Brown, Colleen. and Lewis, Melissa.
first   previous   Page 35 of 35   next   last



background image
Cervical Cancer 35
Table 1
Results Assessing the Amount of Severity, Susceptibility, Self-efficacy, and Response-efficacy Messages in
the Six Women’s Magazines Analyzed
Severity
Susceptibility Self-efficacy Response-efficacy
Cosmopolitan (n = 26) 2.73 (4.45)
a
3.35 (3.61)
b
1.27 (2.13)
b
2.08 (2.30)
c
Mademoiselle (n = 4) 0.25 (0.50)
a
2.75 (2.20)
b
1.00 (0.82)
c
0.50 (0.58)
d
Glamour (n = 13) 19.69 (36.41)
a
5.15 (5.23)
b
0.69 (1.18)
b
4.46 (10.37)
c
Woman’s Day (n = 6) 7.67 (7.79)
a
7.50 (8.36)
b
2.50 (3.21)
c
8.00 (5.06)
c
Ladies’ Home Journal (n = 8) 15.88 (13.76)
a
10.13 (6.06)
b
4.00 (3.59)
abc
9.00 (5.86)
c
Good Housekeeping (n = 23) 1.48 (2.29)
a
0.65 (0.83)
b
0.43 (0.66)
ac
2.61 (3.60)
bc
Note. Numbers outside the parentheses represent mean number of mentions of each category across articles in the
six individual magazines. Numbers inside the parentheses represent standard deviations. Sample size n represents
the number of analyzed articles in each magazine.
Means in the same row with the same subscript and no asterisk are significantly different at the p < .01 level.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 35 of 35   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.