All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Nationwide Newpaper Coverage of Detainee Rights
Unformatted Document Text:  Media and Detainee Rights 3 Introduction: The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the subsequent war in Afghanistan has created some unique problems for the United States government. One of the issues to be dealt with is what to do with the former Taliban fighters who have been captured. The most dangerous have been transported to the detainee camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and placed under heavy guard, and, in some extreme cases, heavily sedated. The main controversy surrounding the detainees is whether or not they should be considered prisoners of war and be afforded the full protection of the Geneva Convention. The US insists that the fighters are: (1) unlawful combatants under the Geneva Convention guidelines and therefore not protected by POW Status; (2) a status of prisoner of war would end the intelligence gathering efforts among the prisoners and hurt attempts to thwart further attacks; (3) the US is granting them the majority of the rights under the Convention and is working to further improve the conditions at the camp. The international community was the first to criticize the US policy (Bennett and Robinson, 2002). Soon after, several human rights groups protested the extreme conditions the prisoners were kept under (Lichtblau, 2002). Others criticized the possible use of military tribunals, which, unlike Court-martials, do not have established due process or safeguards against excess. Other countries have raised concern over the treatment of their citizens in the camps and what possible penalties they could face (all “1 st world” nations except the US have prohibitions against capital punishment). On the international level, this policy threatens the International Coalition lead by the US and the Administrations response to the above concerns has created a fear of US unilateralism. Within the US government, there appears to be a spilt on policy. In a

Authors: Meehan, Sean., Philbin, Brett., Wilson, Sean. and Pollock, John.
first   previous   Page 3 of 32   next   last



background image
Media and Detainee Rights
3
Introduction:
The terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the subsequent war in
Afghanistan has created some unique problems for the United States government. One of
the issues to be dealt with is what to do with the former Taliban fighters who have been
captured. The most dangerous have been transported to the detainee camp in Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba and placed under heavy guard, and, in some extreme cases, heavily sedated.
The main controversy surrounding the detainees is whether or not they should be
considered prisoners of war and be afforded the full protection of the Geneva
Convention. The US insists that the fighters are: (1) unlawful combatants under the
Geneva Convention guidelines and therefore not protected by POW Status; (2) a status of
prisoner of war would end the intelligence gathering efforts among the prisoners and hurt
attempts to thwart further attacks; (3) the US is granting them the majority of the rights
under the Convention and is working to further improve the conditions at the camp.
The international community was the first to criticize the US policy (Bennett and
Robinson, 2002). Soon after, several human rights groups protested the extreme
conditions the prisoners were kept under (Lichtblau, 2002). Others criticized the possible
use of military tribunals, which, unlike Court-martials, do not have established due
process or safeguards against excess. Other countries have raised concern over the
treatment of their citizens in the camps and what possible penalties they could face (all
“1
st
world” nations except the US have prohibitions against capital punishment).
On the international level, this policy threatens the International Coalition lead by
the US and the Administrations response to the above concerns has created a fear of US
unilateralism. Within the US government, there appears to be a spilt on policy. In a


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 32   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.