All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Who is the Real Target? Media Response to Controversial Investigative Reporting
Unformatted Document Text:  ICA-6-11300 19 more kinds of legal charges against ABC’s newsgathering methods than GM did against NBC’s. Therefore, news coverage devoted greater space to explaining Food Lion’s claims. Second, the length of the conflict appears to influence media distraction. In the Food Lion-ABC case, there were four different court rulings, from pre-trial through appeals, over the seven year life of the lawsuit, each providing additional news pegs for the rest of the media. By the end of the case, ABC’s charges against the grocery chain were all but forgotten amidst the First Amendment issues raised by the lawsuit. By contrast, the GM case was settled in a matter of months after the report aired, before legal papers were even served on NBC. There was less media distraction here even though NBC admitted its newsgathering methods were unethical and apologized for the report’s claims against GM. This suggests that the longer the controversy, the greater is the likelihood of media diversion from the substance of the original story, regardless of whether investigative reporters’ own news organizations admit mistakes or stick by their story. Third, the nature of the news organization’s response obviously has some impact, but a counter-intuitive one. Although NBC quickly retracted its story, media coverage of the dispute was less distracted from the claims against GM’s trucks than it was from ABC’s charges against Food Lion, which ABC defended. This implies a paradox: the more that a news organization fights back against targets’ attacks on newsgathering methods, the more likely it may be to distract media attention from its own investigative reporters’ findings. Another set of factors may be considered external to the muckraker-target relationship. The response by victims and their advocates appears to have some influence on subsequent coverage as well. One reason that reporting on the GM-NBC affair maintained greater focus on the problems with GM’s trucks is that consumer safety groups continued to petition government to recall the vehicles, helping to keep the story alive. Although the United Food and Commercial

Authors: Raphael, Chad., Tokunaga, Lori. and Wai, Christina.
first   previous   Page 19 of 28   next   last



background image
ICA-6-11300
19
more kinds of legal charges against ABC’s newsgathering methods than GM did against NBC’s.
Therefore, news coverage devoted greater space to explaining Food Lion’s claims. Second, the
length of the conflict appears to influence media distraction. In the Food Lion-ABC case, there
were four different court rulings, from pre-trial through appeals, over the seven year life of the
lawsuit, each providing additional news pegs for the rest of the media. By the end of the case,
ABC’s charges against the grocery chain were all but forgotten amidst the First Amendment
issues raised by the lawsuit. By contrast, the GM case was settled in a matter of months after the
report aired, before legal papers were even served on NBC. There was less media distraction
here even though NBC admitted its newsgathering methods were unethical and apologized for
the report’s claims against GM. This suggests that the longer the controversy, the greater is the
likelihood of media diversion from the substance of the original story, regardless of whether
investigative reporters’ own news organizations admit mistakes or stick by their story. Third, the
nature of the news organization’s response obviously has some impact, but a counter-intuitive
one. Although NBC quickly retracted its story, media coverage of the dispute was less distracted
from the claims against GM’s trucks than it was from ABC’s charges against Food Lion, which
ABC defended. This implies a paradox: the more that a news organization fights back against
targets’ attacks on newsgathering methods, the more likely it may be to distract media attention
from its own investigative reporters’ findings.
Another set of factors may be considered external to the muckraker-target relationship.
The response by victims and their advocates appears to have some influence on subsequent
coverage as well. One reason that reporting on the GM-NBC affair maintained greater focus on
the problems with GM’s trucks is that consumer safety groups continued to petition government
to recall the vehicles, helping to keep the story alive. Although the United Food and Commercial


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.