All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Perceived Anonymity Adequacy in Performance Evaluations of Supervisors and Coworkers
Unformatted Document Text:  Perceived Anonymity Adequacy 9 H4: A positive relationship exists between the number of raters evaluating a supervisor or coworker and rater’s perceptions of anonymity adequacy. Predictors of anonymity adequacy. In investigating the relationship between each of the previous four factors and anonymity adequacy during performance evaluations, it would also be useful to determine the relative importance of each factor in predicting perceptions of anonymity. Through developing a better understanding of the importance of each factor as a predictor, scholars and practitioners alike will be better suited to foster an adequate level of anonymity during performance evaluations. Consequently, the following research question is posed: RQ1: What is the relative importance of each of the previous four factors in predicting perceptions of anonymity adequacy during performance evaluations of supervisors and coworkers? Concealing Identity Information in Performance Evaluations Recent conceptualizations of anonymity as a fluid construct in which one can be partially anonymous highlight the role of the rater as an active agent (Anonymous, 1998; Hayne & Rice, 1997; Marx, 1999; Pinsonneault & Heppel, 1998). That is, anonymity is no longer imposed upon a rater conducting an evaluation; instead, perceptions of one’s anonymity level are subjectively constructed by the rater him or herself. This shift in the way anonymity is thought about in the context of performance feedback leaves a number of important questions to be addressed. One question in particular is how do raters maintain or enhance their degree of anonymity during performance evaluations? A recently developed typology of identity information offers a useful avenue to pursue this question (Marx, 1999). Anonymity, according to Marx (1999), is “one polar value of a broad dimension of identifiably versus nonidentifiability” (p. 100). An individual is more or less identifiable depending on the degree to which seven types of identity knowledge are known. The seven types

Authors: Rains, Stephen. and Young, Anna.
first   previous   Page 9 of 32   next   last



background image
Perceived Anonymity Adequacy 9
H4: A positive relationship exists between the number of raters evaluating
a supervisor or coworker and rater’s perceptions of anonymity adequacy.
Predictors of anonymity adequacy. In investigating the relationship between each of the
previous four factors and anonymity adequacy during performance evaluations, it would also be
useful to determine the relative importance of each factor in predicting perceptions of anonymity.
Through developing a better understanding of the importance of each factor as a predictor,
scholars and practitioners alike will be better suited to foster an adequate level of anonymity
during performance evaluations. Consequently, the following research question is posed:
RQ1: What is the relative importance of each of the previous four factors in predicting
perceptions of anonymity adequacy during performance evaluations of
supervisors and coworkers?
Concealing Identity Information in Performance Evaluations
Recent conceptualizations of anonymity as a fluid construct in which one can be partially
anonymous highlight the role of the rater as an active agent (Anonymous, 1998; Hayne & Rice,
1997; Marx, 1999; Pinsonneault & Heppel, 1998). That is, anonymity is no longer imposed upon
a rater conducting an evaluation; instead, perceptions of one’s anonymity level are subjectively
constructed by the rater him or herself. This shift in the way anonymity is thought about in the
context of performance feedback leaves a number of important questions to be addressed. One
question in particular is how do raters maintain or enhance their degree of anonymity during
performance evaluations? A recently developed typology of identity information offers a useful
avenue to pursue this question (Marx, 1999).
Anonymity, according to Marx (1999), is “one polar value of a broad dimension of
identifiably versus nonidentifiability” (p. 100). An individual is more or less identifiable
depending on the degree to which seven types of identity knowledge are known. The seven types


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 32   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.