(Page 19 of 36) - Perceived Outgroup Homogeneity: Factors Contributing to Perceived Similarities in Attitudes toward People with AIDS and by Gender and Sexual Orientation authored by Greene, Kathryn. and Banerjee, Smita.

Info/Citation	FAQ Research All Academic Inc.
Document

Perceived Outgroup Homogeneity: Factors Contributing to Perceived Similarities in Attitudes toward People with AIDS and by Gender and Sexual Orientation

Unformatted Document Text: Outgroup homogeneity effects 19 Personality. For personality, the interaction between target person sexual orientation and respondent sex was significant, F(1, 470) = 13.18, p < .001. The combination of female respondent and target person heterosexual orientation (M = 1.98, SD = .059) is a better predictor of personality effect than combinations of female respondent and target person homosexual orientation (M = 2.20, SD = .07), male respondent and target person heterosexual orientation (M = 2.21, SD = .07), and male respondent and target person homosexual orientation (M = 2.69, SD = .08) respectively. A significant interaction for personality was found between topic of disease and respondent sex, F(1, 470) = 5.94, p < .05. The combination of female respondent and cancer (M = 1.95, SD = .06) is a better predictor of personality effect than combinations of female respondent and AIDS (M = 2.23, SD = .06), male respondent and cancer (M = 2.23, SD = .07), and male respondent and AIDS (M = 2.67, SD = .08) respectively. The interaction between topic of disease and target person sexual orientation was also significant for personality, F(1, 470) = 5.85, p < .05. The combination of cancer and target person heterosexual orientation (M = 1.95, SD = .05) is a better predictor of personality effect than combinations of cancer and target person homosexual orientation (M = 2.24, SD = .05), AIDS and target person heterosexual orientation (M = 2.24, SD = .052), and AIDS and target person homosexual orientation (M = 2.66, SD = .06) respectively. A fourth significant interaction for personality was found between respondent sex and target person sex, F(1, 470) = 4.64, p < .05. The combination of female respondent and female target person (M = 2.09, SD = .06) is a better predictor of personality effect than combinations of female respondent and male target person (M = 2.10, SD = .06),

Authors: Greene, Kathryn. and Banerjee, Smita.

first

previous

Page 19 of 36

next

last

background image

Outgroup homogeneity effects 19

Personality. For personality, the interaction between target person sexual

orientation and respondent sex was significant, F(1, 470) = 13.18, p < .001. The

combination of female respondent and target person heterosexual orientation (M = 1.98,

SD = .059) is a better predictor of personality effect than combinations of female

respondent and target person homosexual orientation (M = 2.20, SD = .07), male

respondent and target person heterosexual orientation (M = 2.21, SD = .07), and male

respondent and target person homosexual orientation (M = 2.69, SD = .08) respectively.

A significant interaction for personality was found between topic of disease and

respondent sex, F(1, 470) = 5.94, p < .05. The combination of female respondent and

cancer (M = 1.95, SD = .06) is a better predictor of personality effect than combinations

of female respondent and AIDS (M = 2.23, SD = .06), male respondent and cancer (M =

2.23, SD = .07), and male respondent and AIDS (M = 2.67, SD = .08) respectively.

The interaction between topic of disease and target person sexual orientation was

also significant for personality, F(1, 470) = 5.85, p < .05. The combination of cancer and

target person heterosexual orientation (M = 1.95, SD = .05) is a better predictor of

personality effect than combinations of cancer and target person homosexual orientation

(M = 2.24, SD = .05), AIDS and target person heterosexual orientation (M = 2.24, SD =

.052), and AIDS and target person homosexual orientation (M = 2.66, SD = .06)

respectively.

A fourth significant interaction for personality was found between respondent sex

and target person sex, F(1, 470) = 4.64, p < .05. The combination of female respondent

and female target person (M = 2.09, SD = .06) is a better predictor of personality effect

than combinations of female respondent and male target person (M = 2.10, SD = .06),

Convention

Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.

Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.

Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!

Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!

Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.

Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!

Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!

Click here for more information.

first

previous

Page 19 of 36

next

last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.