(Page 29 of 31) - ORGANIZATIONAL ADOPTION OF AN INTRANET-BASED PERFORMANCE REPORTING SYSTEM: A TEST OF ROGERS' MODEL OF INNOVATION authored by Hallahan, Kirk. and Weitzel, Debby.

Info/Citation	FAQ Research All Academic Inc.
Document

ORGANIZATIONAL ADOPTION OF AN INTRANET-BASED PERFORMANCE REPORTING SYSTEM: A TEST OF ROGERS' MODEL OF INNOVATION

Unformatted Document Text: Adoption of an Intranet Performance Reporting System 29 Table 1. Pearson r Correlations of Independent Variables with Key Adoption Measures H1 a) Prior experience with computers in general r p Familiarity with e-Power .219 .003 Assessment of e-Power .115 .129 Evaluation of e-Power .125 .105 Willingness to recommend .128 .086 b) Prior experience with reporting programs r p Familiarity with e-Power .493 .000 Assessment of e-Power .297 .000 Evaluation of e-Power .287 .000 Willingness to recommend .168 .024 c) Agreement with Cooperative Extension Accountability Norms r p Familiarity with e-Power .017 .823 Assessment of e-Power .300 .000 Evaluation of e-Power .390 .000 Willingness to recommend .270 .000 H2 a) Attitudes Towards Computer r p Familiarity with e-Power .236 .001 Assessment of e-Power .198 .009 Evaluation of e-Power .166 .032 Willingness to recommend .144 .056 b) Computer Anxiety r p Familiarity with e-Power -.222 .003 Assessment of e-Power -.209 .006 Evaluation of e-Power -.157 .044 Willingness to recommend -.173 .021 c) Computer Self-Efficacy r p Familiarity with e-Power .206 .005 Assessment of e-Power .159 .037 Evaluation of e-Power .094 .228 Willingness to recommend .192 .011 H3 Personal Innovativeness r p Familiarity with e-Power .226 .002 Assessment of e-Power .108 .153 Evaluation of e-Power .123 .113 Willingness to recommend .039 .605 H4 Age r p Familiarity with e-Power -.023 .765 Assessment of e-Power .099 .204 Evaluation of e-Power .022 .778 Willingness to recommend -.023 .761 H5 Perceptions of e-Power as Innovation r p Familiarity with e-Power .454 .000 Assessment of e-Power . 742 .000. Evaluation of e-Power .646 .000 Willingness to Recommend .671 .000 H6 a) Extent of Problems (Self-Reports) r p Familiarity with e-Power .113 .131 Assessment of e-Power . 333 .000. Evaluation of e-Power .276 .000 Willingness to Recommend .335 .000 b) Number of Problems Identified r p Familiarity with e-Power .042 .591 Assessment of e-Power -.148 .053 Evaluation of e-Power -.103 .186 Willingness to Recommend -.226 .003 c) Number of Personal Consultations r p Familiarity with e-Power .194 .008 Assessment of e-Power .-.036 .000. Evaluation of e-Power -.026 .730 Willingness to Recommend .-146. .050

Authors: Hallahan, Kirk. and Weitzel, Debby.

first

previous

Page 29 of 31

next

last

background image

Adoption of an Intranet Performance Reporting System

29

Table 1.
Pearson r Correlations of Independent Variables with Key Adoption Measures

H1

a) Prior experience with computers in general

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .219

.003

Assessment of e-Power

.115

.129

Evaluation of e-Power

.125

.105

Willingness to recommend .128

.086

b) Prior experience with reporting programs

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .493

.000

Assessment of e-Power

.297

.000

Evaluation of e-Power

.287

.000

Willingness to recommend .168

.024

c) Agreement with Cooperative
Extension Accountability Norms

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .017

.823

Assessment of e-Power .300

.000

Evaluation of e-Power

.390

.000

Willingness to recommend .270

.000

H2

a) Attitudes Towards Computer

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .236

.001

Assessment of e-Power

.198

.009

Evaluation of e-Power

.166

.032

Willingness to recommend .144

.056

b) Computer Anxiety

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power -.222

.003

Assessment of e-Power

-.209

.006

Evaluation of e-Power

-.157

.044

Willingness to recommend -.173 .021

c) Computer Self-Efficacy

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .206

.005

Assessment of e-Power

.159

.037

Evaluation of e-Power

.094

.228

Willingness to recommend .192

.011

H3 Personal Innovativeness

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .226

.002

Assessment of e-Power

.108

.153

Evaluation of e-Power

.123

.113

Willingness to recommend .039

.605

H4 Age

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power -.023

.765

Assessment of e-Power

.099

.204

Evaluation of e-Power

.022

.778

Willingness to recommend -.023

.761

H5 Perceptions of e-Power as Innovation

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .454

.000

Assessment of e-Power

. 742 .000.

Evaluation of e-Power

.646

.000

Willingness to Recommend .671

.000

H6

a) Extent of Problems (Self-Reports)

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .113

.131

Assessment of e-Power

. 333 .000.

Evaluation of e-Power

.276

.000

Willingness to Recommend .335

.000

b) Number of Problems Identified

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .042

.591

Assessment of e-Power

-.148 .053

Evaluation of e-Power

-.103

.186

Willingness to Recommend -.226 .003

c) Number of Personal Consultations

r

p

Familiarity with e-Power .194

.008

Assessment of e-Power .-.036 .000.

Evaluation of e-Power

-.026

.730

Willingness to Recommend .-146. .050

Convention

All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.

Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.

Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!

Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!

Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.

Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!

Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!

Click here for more information.

first

previous

Page 29 of 31

next

last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.