 |
Technology, Contracts, and the Internet: Private Governance for Global Communications
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
2
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, I examine whether this new system of regulation is legitimate. Although any assessment of absolute legitimacy is problematic, ICANN clearly lacks most of the common mechanisms to ensure representation of relevant views, accountability to outside parties, and transparency in its operations. As a result, the organization’s continued existence depends on its success in global power politics. It seems likely that its organizational form will continue to evolve until powerful interests reach a stable equilibrium and embody that equilibrium in ICANN’s institutional design. ICANN could also fracture or fail if a rival institution should be able to win the support of sufficient number of influential parties. In other words, ICANN’s lack of legitimacy makes it vulnerable to rather crude power politics. ICANN is significant not only for the Internet but for global governance generally. As an emerging new institutional form it can be characterized in three ways, depending on the significance accorded the roles of the US government and the private corporation. The first view emphasizes US hegemony. Here, the private corporation can be understood as the mere agent of the US through which the US embodies its commands in contract law so as to circumvent other nations’ sovereignty. US global hegemony is achieved through private law. Second, ICANN may be characterized as a semi-independent regulator in which powerful private entities make global rules for cyberspace. In this view, the US possesses unique veto rights but does not really control ICANN. Third, should the US act on its public commitment to grant ICANN its independence, ICANN would represent a new kind of private sovereign. In a manner similar to how the private International Olympic Committee controls those global games, ICANN would control cyberspace.
|
| |
| |
|
|
2
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, I examine whether this new system of regulation is legitimate. Although any assessment of absolute legitimacy is problematic, ICANN clearly lacks most of the common mechanisms to ensure representation of relevant views, accountability to outside parties, and transparency in its operations. As a result, the organization’s continued existence depends on its success in global power politics. It seems likely that its organizational form will continue to evolve until powerful interests reach a stable equilibrium and embody that equilibrium in ICANN’s institutional design. ICANN could also fracture or fail if a rival institution should be able to win the support of sufficient number of influential parties. In other words, ICANN’s lack of legitimacy makes it vulnerable to rather crude power politics. ICANN is significant not only for the Internet but for global governance generally. As an emerging new institutional form it can be characterized in three ways, depending on the significance accorded the roles of the US government and the private corporation. The first view emphasizes US hegemony. Here, the private corporation can be understood as the mere agent of the US through which the US embodies its commands in contract law so as to circumvent other nations’ sovereignty. US global hegemony is achieved through private law. Second, ICANN may be characterized as a semi-independent regulator in which powerful private entities make global rules for cyberspace. In this view, the US possesses unique veto rights but does not really control ICANN. Third, should the US act on its public commitment to grant ICANN its independence, ICANN would represent a new kind of private sovereign. In a manner similar to how the private International Olympic Committee controls those global games, ICANN would control cyberspace.
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|