All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Who am I?": Identity, Self and Narrative within Organizational Contexts
Unformatted Document Text:  “Who am I?”- 5 PIN jc19265 Mead (1934) also distinguishes between the “I” and “me” and suggests that “the ‘I’ is the response of the organism to the attitudes of the other; the ‘me’ is the organized set of attitudes of others which one himself assumes” (p. 175). It seems as if Mead is arguing for a separation between what may be called an individualistic self (the I) and a more relational self (the me). However, Mead asserts that subjective experience (the me) is only significant as it is translated into significant symbols and positions subjective experience within the larger social order. In responding to psychological claims about individual action and distinctive personalities, Mead explains that the uniqueness of individuals does not threaten the conception of a social theory of self, but rather highlights the differing perspectives and standpoints from which individuals are positioned in relation to generalized others. Individual personality can only be conceptualized and understood through the conversations of gestures and the observation of self as object, which is a perspective that only the social system of language and symbols can provide. Dramaturgical Self In “line” with understanding self as symbolically constituted, Goffman (1959, 1967) proposed that self is created through everyday ritualized performances within social interaction, and that the self is a strategic, manipulative player. Goffman speaks of identity in terms of face, in which an image of self is constructed in accordance with approved social norms. Face is not something that individuals individually possess, but is dependent on interaction with others to be supported. The interdependence of interactions and society was considered by Goffman (1967) as a fundamental social constraint because “social face is not considered a personal possession, but it is on loan from society; it will be withdrawn unless individuals conduct themselves in ways that are worthy of it” (p. 10). Through face-work, and the strategic actions taken by individuals to maintain or protect their face, individuals constantly attempt to restore balance during

Authors: Cattafesta, Joanne.
first   previous   Page 5 of 27   next   last



background image
“Who am I?”- 5
PIN jc19265
Mead (1934) also distinguishes between the “I” and “me” and suggests that “the ‘I’ is the
response of the organism to the attitudes of the other; the ‘me’ is the organized set of attitudes of
others which one himself assumes” (p. 175). It seems as if Mead is arguing for a separation
between what may be called an individualistic self (the I) and a more relational self (the me).
However, Mead asserts that subjective experience (the me) is only significant as it is translated
into significant symbols and positions subjective experience within the larger social order. In
responding to psychological claims about individual action and distinctive personalities, Mead
explains that the uniqueness of individuals does not threaten the conception of a social theory of
self, but rather highlights the differing perspectives and standpoints from which individuals are
positioned in relation to generalized others. Individual personality can only be conceptualized
and understood through the conversations of gestures and the observation of self as object, which
is a perspective that only the social system of language and symbols can provide.
Dramaturgical Self
In “line” with understanding self as symbolically constituted, Goffman (1959, 1967)
proposed that self is created through everyday ritualized performances within social interaction,
and that the self is a strategic, manipulative player. Goffman speaks of identity in terms of face,
in which an image of self is constructed in accordance with approved social norms. Face is not
something that individuals individually possess, but is dependent on interaction with others to be
supported. The interdependence of interactions and society was considered by Goffman (1967)
as a fundamental social constraint because “social face is not considered a personal possession,
but it is on loan from society; it will be withdrawn unless individuals conduct themselves in ways
that are worthy of it” (p. 10). Through face-work, and the strategic actions taken by individuals
to maintain or protect their face, individuals constantly attempt to restore balance during


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 5 of 27   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.