Citation

Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Causal Model of Perception and Management of Face Threats

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Wilson and colleagues (Cai & Wilson, 2000, Wilson, Aleman, & Leatham, 1998; Wilson, Anastsiou, Aleman, Kim, & Oetzel, 2000; Wilson, Anastsiou, Kim, & Aleman, 1999; Wilson, Kim, & Meischke, 1991/1992; Wilson & Kunkel, 2000) offer a revised analysis of how face threats arise and are managed within compliance-gaining situations defined by specific influence goals. This study extends their work by examining through structural equation modeling how students manage threats to face within compliance-gaining situations involving two different influence goals: giving advice versus asking favors. Results for perceived face threats are largely consistent with the revised analysis but suggest further investigation, especially of relationships between face threats and motivations for reason giving. Comparisons with Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory, as well as implications for future research, are drawn.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

face (193), target (129), reason (117), sourc (106), threat (105), favor (85), give (81), messag (81), advic (76), wilson (68), goal (67), influenc (59), posit (57), negat (57), ask (54), focus (48), implic (48), path (44), ident (44), particip (43), perceiv (41),

Author's Keywords:

persuasion, favors, advice, face threats, politeness theory,
Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: International Communication Association
URL:
http://www.icahdq.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112039_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Morgan, Wendy., Wilson, Steven., Aleman, Carlos., Anastasiou, Lefki., Kim, Min-Sun. and Oetzel, John. "Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Causal Model of Perception and Management of Face Threats" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott Hotel, San Diego, CA, May 27, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112039_index.html>

APA Citation:

Morgan, W. M., Wilson, S. R., Aleman, C. G., Anastasiou, L. , Kim, M. and Oetzel, J. G. , 2003-05-27 "Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Causal Model of Perception and Management of Face Threats" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott Hotel, San Diego, CA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112039_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Wilson and colleagues (Cai & Wilson, 2000, Wilson, Aleman, & Leatham, 1998; Wilson, Anastsiou, Aleman, Kim, & Oetzel, 2000; Wilson, Anastsiou, Kim, & Aleman, 1999; Wilson, Kim, & Meischke, 1991/1992; Wilson & Kunkel, 2000) offer a revised analysis of how face threats arise and are managed within compliance-gaining situations defined by specific influence goals. This study extends their work by examining through structural equation modeling how students manage threats to face within compliance-gaining situations involving two different influence goals: giving advice versus asking favors. Results for perceived face threats are largely consistent with the revised analysis but suggest further investigation, especially of relationships between face threats and motivations for reason giving. Comparisons with Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory, as well as implications for future research, are drawn.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.

Document Type: .PDF
Page count: 37
Word count: 8678
Text sample:
Identity Implications 1 Identity Implications of Influence Goals: A Causal Model of the Perception and Management of Face Threats Abstract Wilson and colleagues (Cai & Wilson 2000 Wilson Aleman & Leatham 1998; Wilson Anastsiou Aleman Kim & Oetzel 2000; Wilson Anastsiou Kim & Aleman 1999; Wilson Kim & Meischke 1991/1992; Wilson & Kunkel 2000) offer a revised analysis of how face threats arise and are managed within compliance-gaining situations defined by specific influence goals. This study extends their work
correlation with advice. Figure 2. Relationships Found Between Model Variables. Note: ONF=Message source’s own negative face; NOSY=Source’s positive face (nosy); LAZY=Source’s positive face (lazy); INCOMP=Target’s positive face (incompetent); TNF=Target’s negative face; SELFREAS=Number of self-focused reasons given; OTHEREAS=Number of other-focused reasons given; FAVOR.A=Favor versus advice. Because FAVOR.A is a dichotomous variable where favor is coded as 1 and advice is coded as 0 positive (+) paths originating with FAVOR.A indicate a positive correlation with favor whereas negative (-) paths originating


Similar Titles:
The Three Faces of Negative Campaigning: The Democratic Implications of Attack Ads, Cyncial News and Fear Arousing Messages

Perceived Face Threat of Honest but Hurtful Evaluative Messages in Romantic Relationships

The Influence of Positive, Negative, and Neutral Messages on Voluntary Hearing-Protection Behaviors Among Miners

Culture, Positive and Negative Face Threats, and Apology Intention

Promoting or Preventing Social Change? Perceived Threat (Instrumental/Ideological) and Identity as Protest Participation Motives.


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.