All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Parents' concerns over the Internet: A cross-cultural comparison
Unformatted Document Text:  - Parents’ Concerns 19 measure of parental responsibility and were frustrated to find they were lacking, Israeli parents constructed their children as experts to start with, and seemed only too happy to regard the children as responsible to their Internet acts. And so even though the survey resonated with US conventional constructions of the Internet and adopted a notion of concern as its central descriptive framework, it did not impose this notion on Israelis; rather, it allowed them to suggest alternative constructions and to describe alternative relationships between individuals and technologies. Future work, however, could renegotiate the benefits of reliability with the gains of validity and consider either adjustments in the survey that would resonate with local discourses and practices, or survey construction that is from the start more responsive to cultural variation. Seeking to account for what he conceived as adolescent girls’ inadequate understanding of privacy, Merten (1999) resorted to an implicit developmental theory and suggested that as they grow older—as they become acculturated—girls distinguish better the private from that which is publicly open. Friedman (1997), at the same time, warned that computer technology makes it difficult, if not impossible for adolescents to acknowledge privacy and to be aware of its violation. Should parent-child differences in the construction of the information that ought to remain unavailable to the market be seen as reflecting developmental differences that will eventually disappear? Are they the inevitable result of the pervasive use of computer- mediated communication technologies? Or are they reflecting the growth of cultures that are distinctive in their relationships with the market, as this study suggests? Comparative longitudinal research will be able to provide answers to these questions.

Authors: Ribak, Rivka.
first   previous   Page 19 of 25   next   last



background image
- Parents’ Concerns
19
measure of parental responsibility and were frustrated to find they were lacking,
Israeli parents constructed their children as experts to start with, and seemed only too
happy to regard the children as responsible to their Internet acts.
And so even though the survey resonated with US conventional constructions of the
Internet and adopted a notion of concern as its central descriptive framework, it did
not impose this notion on Israelis; rather, it allowed them to suggest alternative
constructions and to describe alternative relationships between individuals and
technologies. Future work, however, could renegotiate the benefits of reliability with
the gains of validity and consider either adjustments in the survey that would resonate
with local discourses and practices, or survey construction that is from the start more
responsive to cultural variation.
Seeking to account for what he conceived as adolescent girls’ inadequate
understanding of privacy, Merten (1999) resorted to an implicit developmental theory
and suggested that as they grow older—as they become acculturated—girls
distinguish better the private from that which is publicly open. Friedman (1997), at
the same time, warned that computer technology makes it difficult, if not impossible
for adolescents to acknowledge privacy and to be aware of its violation. Should
parent-child differences in the construction of the information that ought to remain
unavailable to the market be seen as reflecting developmental differences that will
eventually disappear? Are they the inevitable result of the pervasive use of computer-
mediated communication technologies? Or are they reflecting the growth of cultures
that are distinctive in their relationships with the market, as this study suggests?
Comparative longitudinal research will be able to provide answers to these questions.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 25   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.