All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Selective Exposure and Impact of a Cyber Election Campaign on Voting Behaviors: U.S. Presidential Election 2000
Unformatted Document Text:  Cyber Campaign 2 Impact of a Cyber Election Campaign on Voting Behaviors: U.S. Presidential Election 2000 INTRODUCTION In the presidential election of 2000, every candidate jumped onto the online campaign bandwagon. Online campaigning made its debut in the 1996 presidential race, but was used only as a novelty. Some argue that online campaigning in 2000 was still a “beta version” and did not carry substantial implications (Dickerson, 2000). While television is said to have contributed to John F. Kennedy’s victory over Nixon in the 1960 presidential election, the Internet has not played a crucial role in presidential elections. There is no “J.F.K. of the Internet” yet (Reed, 1999). Online campaigning, however, may have the potential to change the way candidates campaign. The Internet allows candidates to communicate with voters, strengthen support, raise funds, and recruit volunteers in ways that other media do not. Some argue that the Internet will change the whole process of politics including election campaigns, policymaking, and perhaps even the balance of political power in the near future (Hill & Hughes, 1998; Morris, 1999). The composite of media channels for modern election campaigns may soon be transformed due to the utilization of the Internet. While the utilization of the Internet by politicians has been documented and applied to actual campaign strategies, our understanding of how and why voters use online campaign information is still vague. Because the Internet provides three unique features that will empower voters, it is worth investigating online campaigning from the standpoint of the voters. One of the unique features is that information on the Web is of the “pull” variety, which means that the selection of online information is controlled by Web users. Users can immediately “pull” information from online media at their convenience, while information in newspapers and on television is “pushed” to the readers and viewers. The second feature,

Authors: Inoue, Yasuhiro.
first   previous   Page 2 of 32   next   last



background image
Cyber Campaign
2
Impact of a Cyber Election Campaign on Voting Behaviors:
U.S. Presidential Election 2000
INTRODUCTION
In the presidential election of 2000, every candidate jumped onto the online
campaign bandwagon. Online campaigning made its debut in the 1996 presidential race, but
was used only as a novelty. Some argue that online campaigning in 2000 was still a “beta
version” and did not carry substantial implications (Dickerson, 2000). While television is
said to have contributed to John F. Kennedy’s victory over Nixon in the 1960 presidential
election, the Internet has not played a crucial role in presidential elections. There is no
“J.F.K. of the Internet” yet (Reed, 1999).
Online campaigning, however, may have the potential to change the way candidates
campaign. The Internet allows candidates to communicate with voters, strengthen support,
raise funds, and recruit volunteers in ways that other media do not. Some argue that the
Internet will change the whole process of politics including election campaigns, policymaking,
and perhaps even the balance of political power in the near future (Hill & Hughes, 1998;
Morris, 1999). The composite of media channels for modern election campaigns may soon
be transformed due to the utilization of the Internet.
While the utilization of the Internet by politicians has been documented and applied
to actual campaign strategies, our understanding of how and why voters use online campaign
information is still vague. Because the Internet provides three unique features that will
empower voters, it is worth investigating online campaigning from the standpoint of the
voters. One of the unique features is that information on the Web is of the “pull” variety,
which means that the selection of online information is controlled by Web users. Users can
immediately “pull” information from online media at their convenience, while information in
newspapers and on television is “pushed” to the readers and viewers. The second feature,


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 32   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.