|
|
|
|
A Meta-Analytical Review of the Relationship between Teacher Immediacy and Student Learning |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This meta-analysis reviews the findings of 81 studies (N = 24,474) examining the relationship between teachers' verbal and/or nonverbal immediacy and students' learning outcomes. The cumulative evidence indicates a meaningful correlation (r = .50) between overall teacher immediacy and overall student learning. Average correlations were obtained for teachers' verbal immediacy (r = .47), nonverbal immediacy (r = .48), and combined-only immediacy (r = .55) in relation to overall student learning. Teachers' verbal immediacy was found to correlate with students' perceived learning (r = .49), affective learning (r = .49), and cognitive learning (r = .06). Teachers' nonverbal immediacy was found to correlate with students' perceived learning (r = .51), affective learning (r = .49), and cognitive learning (r = .17). Average effect sizes were generally smaller in experimental research designs than in survey-type research. The cumulative results of this meta-analysis confirm that teacher immediacy has a substantial relationship with certain attitudes and perceptions of students in relation to their learning, but an almost negligible relationship with cognitive learning performance. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
immediaci (255), learn (255), teacher (137), al (108), student (107), communic (104), studi (97), analysi (87), measur (80), r (79), nonverb (78), meta (76), cognit (72), affect (72), research (68), meta-analysi (67), j (62), verbal (62), behavior (60), averag (58), 1990 (58), |
Author's Keywords:
|
learning, cognitive, affective, perceived, immediacy, verbal, nonverbal, meta-analysis |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Communication Association URL: http://www.icahdq.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Witt, Paul., Wheeless, Lawrence. and Allen, Mike. "A Meta-Analytical Review of the Relationship between Teacher Immediacy and Student Learning" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott Hotel, San Diego, CA, May 27, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112238_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R. and Allen, M. , 2003-05-27 "A Meta-Analytical Review of the Relationship between Teacher Immediacy and Student Learning" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Marriott Hotel, San Diego, CA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112238_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This meta-analysis reviews the findings of 81 studies (N = 24,474) examining the relationship between teachers' verbal and/or nonverbal immediacy and students' learning outcomes. The cumulative evidence indicates a meaningful correlation (r = .50) between overall teacher immediacy and overall student learning. Average correlations were obtained for teachers' verbal immediacy (r = .47), nonverbal immediacy (r = .48), and combined-only immediacy (r = .55) in relation to overall student learning. Teachers' verbal immediacy was found to correlate with students' perceived learning (r = .49), affective learning (r = .49), and cognitive learning (r = .06). Teachers' nonverbal immediacy was found to correlate with students' perceived learning (r = .51), affective learning (r = .49), and cognitive learning (r = .17). Average effect sizes were generally smaller in experimental research designs than in survey-type research. The cumulative results of this meta-analysis confirm that teacher immediacy has a substantial relationship with certain attitudes and perceptions of students in relation to their learning, but an almost negligible relationship with cognitive learning performance. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
41 |
| Word count: |
11028 |
| Text sample: |
| ICA-18-10234 A Meta-Analytical Review of the Relationship between Teacher Immediacy and Student Learning Abstract This meta-analysis reviews the findings of 81 studies (N = 24 474) examining the relationship between teachers’ verbal and/or nonverbal immediacy and students’ learning outcomes. The cumulative evidence indicates a meaningful correlation (r = .50) between overall teacher immediacy and overall student learning. Average correlations were obtained for teachers’ verbal immediacy (r = .47) nonverbal immediacy (r = .48) and combined-only immediacy (r = .55) |
| 81.5 18.5 Cognitive Learning (average r = .12) Probability that student score is Below Median Above Median % Increase Teacher’s combined immediacy is: Above average 44 56 27% Below Average 56 44 Affective Learning (average r = .55) Probability that Student score is Below Median Above Median % Increase Teacher’s combined immediacy is: Above average 22.5 77.5 344% Below Average 77.5 22.5 |
Similar Titles:
A Burning Issue in Teaching: The Impact of Teacher Burnout and Nonverbal Immediacy on Student Motivation and Affective Learning
Student to Student Communication, Affective Learning and Instructor Nonverbal Immediacy
The Influence of Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy and Teacher Credibility on Student Motivation and Affective Learning.
|
|