All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Bad Words and Good Samaritans: Defamatory Speech in Cyberspace
Unformatted Document Text:  28 Spencer, M. A. (2000). Defamatory e-mail and employer liability: Why razing Zeran v. America Online is a good thing. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 6, 25+. Available at <http://law.richmond.edu/jolt//v6i5/article4.html> Stratton Oakmont, Inc. and Daniel Porush, v. Prodigy Services Co., 23 Med. L. Rptr. 1795 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., May 24, 1995, 1995a). Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co., No. 94-03163 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., December 11, 1995b) Suarez Corp. Ind. v. Meeks, No. 267513 (Ct. of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga Co., Ohio, 1994). Waldman, B. J. (1999). A unified approach to cyber-libel: Defamation on the Internet, a suggested approach. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 6, 9+. Available at < http://law.richmond.edu/jolt//v6i2/note1.html> Walker, M. (1995, 27 May). Internet rocked by US libel case. London Guardian, p. 3. Whitney v. California, 274 U,S, 357 (1927). Wiener, D. (1999). Negligent publication of statements posted on electronic bulletin boards: Is there any liability left after Zeran? Santa Clara Law Review, 39, 905-939. Zeran v. America Online, 958 F. Supp. 1124 (E.D. Va. 1997a). Zeran v. America Online, 129 F.4d 327 (4 th Cir. 1997b). Zeran v. America Online, 524 U.S. 937 (1998). Zitner, A. (1995, 26 May). New York judge allows ground-breaking libel suit against Prodigy. Boston Globe, p. 68.

Authors: Herbeck, Dale.
first   previous   Page 28 of 28   next   last



background image
28
Spencer, M. A. (2000). Defamatory e-mail and employer liability: Why razing Zeran v.
America Online is a good thing. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 6, 25+.
Available at <http://law.richmond.edu/jolt//v6i5/article4.html>
Stratton Oakmont, Inc. and Daniel Porush, v. Prodigy Services Co., 23 Med. L. Rptr. 1795 (N.Y.
Sup. Ct., May 24, 1995, 1995a).
Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co., No. 94-03163 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., December 11,
1995b)
Suarez Corp. Ind. v. Meeks, No. 267513 (Ct. of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga Co., Ohio, 1994).
Waldman, B. J. (1999). A unified approach to cyber-libel: Defamation on the Internet, a
suggested approach. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 6, 9+. Available at <
http://law.richmond.edu/jolt//v6i2/note1.html>
Walker, M. (1995, 27 May). Internet rocked by US libel case. London Guardian, p. 3.
Whitney v. California, 274 U,S, 357 (1927).
Wiener, D. (1999). Negligent publication of statements posted on electronic bulletin boards: Is
there any liability left after Zeran? Santa Clara Law Review, 39, 905-939.
Zeran v. America Online, 958 F. Supp. 1124 (E.D. Va. 1997a).
Zeran v. America Online, 129 F.4d 327 (4
th
Cir. 1997b).
Zeran v. America Online, 524 U.S. 937 (1998).
Zitner, A. (1995, 26 May). New York judge allows ground-breaking libel suit against Prodigy.
Boston Globe, p. 68.


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 28 of 28   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.