 |
Effects of Representational Similarity on Deindividuation and Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
29
Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making:
Communication processes and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human
Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent
informational influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current Issues in European Social
Psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 139-182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of
computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risky-shift phenomenon in small decision-making
groups: A test of the information-exchange hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 3, 75-84.
Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated
communication: observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-
mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation, and
group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
Lea, M., Spears, R., de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects
on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 526-
537.
Lee, E-J., & Nass, C. (2002). An experimental test of normative group influence and
representation effects in computer-mediated communication: When interacting via computers
differs from interaction with computers. Human Communication Research, 28, 349-381.
Maslach, C. (1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 1, 264-74.
McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it:
Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied
|
| |
| |
|
|
29
Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making:
Communication processes and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human
Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Social identity and conformity: A theory of referent
informational influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current Issues in European Social
Psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 139-182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of
computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risky-shift phenomenon in small decision-making
groups: A test of the information-exchange hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 3, 75-84.
Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated
communication: observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-
mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, deindividuation, and
group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
Lea, M., Spears, R., de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects
on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 526-
537.
Lee, E-J., & Nass, C. (2002). An experimental test of normative group influence and
representation effects in computer-mediated communication: When interacting via computers
differs from interaction with computers. Human Communication Research, 28, 349-381.
Maslach, C. (1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 1, 264-74.
McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it:
Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied
|
|
 Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
