All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Effects of Representational Similarity on Deindividuation and Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication
Unformatted Document Text:  30 Psychology, 82, 706-718. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1997). Quality of decisions, group norms, and social identity: Biased sampling or sampled biases. Paper presented at the Fifth Munster Workshop on the Social Identity Approach, Rothenberge, Germany. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta- analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE- Effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1999). Social identity, normative content and ‘deindividuation’ in computer-mediated groups. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content (pp. 164-183). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & deGroot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer- mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254. Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behavior as social action. In J.C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P.J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self- categorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp.161-198). Chichester, UK: Wiley. Shamp, S. A. (1991). Mechanomorphism in perception of computer commuication partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 141-161. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.

Authors: Lee, Eun-Ju.
first   previous   Page 30 of 36   next   last



background image
30
Psychology, 82, 706-718.
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1997). Quality of decisions, group norms, and social identity:
Biased sampling or sampled biases. Paper presented at the Fifth Munster Workshop on the Social
Identity Approach, Rothenberge, Germany.
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta-
analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-
Effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1999). Social identity, normative content and
‘deindividuation’ in computer-mediated groups. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.),
Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content (pp. 164-183). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & deGroot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-
mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254.
Reicher, S. D. (1987). Crowd behavior as social action. In J.C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P.J.
Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-
categorization theory (pp. 171-202). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of
deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social
Psychology (Vol. 6, pp.161-198). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Shamp, S. A. (1991). Mechanomorphism in perception of computer commuication
partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 141-161.
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in
computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37,
157-187.


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 30 of 36   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.