All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Self and Peer Evaluation in Undergraduate Education: When Promises are Worth Risking the Perils
Unformatted Document Text:  19 Appendix I. Peer Evaluation Form For Non-Anonymous Evaluations with No Criteria Provided Write down the names of the students whose works you received to evaluate (including your own) and next to each person’s name write the word and grade from the following list that best describes that person’s work: Excellent (4.5 - 5 points) Good (4.0 – 4.5 points) Ordinary (3.5 – 4.0 points) Marginal (3.0 – 3.5 points) Unsatisfactory (0 – 3.0points) Name Rating Date Name of the rater Peer Evaluation Form For Anonymous Evaluations with No Criteria Provided Peer evaluation Write down the identification numbers of the students whose works you received to evaluate (including your own). Do not use your school ID or social security number. To ensure anonymity of grades and personal information, make use of the identification numbers provided by the instructor (you can find these identification numbers at the top of the essays provided in the package for your evaluation). Your personal ID# is written at the top of the copy of your essay. Then, next to each person’s ID write the word and the grade from the following list that best describes that person’s work: Excellent (4.5 - 5 points) Good (4.0 – 4.5 points) Ordinary (3.5 – 4.0 points) Marginal (3.0 – 3.5 points) Unsatisfactory (0 – 3.0points) Name Rating Date Identification number of the rater

Authors: Omelicheva, Mariya.
first   previous   Page 19 of 24   next   last



background image
19
Appendix I.
Peer Evaluation Form For Non-Anonymous Evaluations with No Criteria Provided
Write down the names of the students whose works you received to evaluate (including
your own) and next to each person’s name write the word and grade from the following
list that best describes that person’s work:

Excellent (4.5 - 5 points)
Good (4.0 – 4.5 points)
Ordinary (3.5 – 4.0 points)
Marginal (3.0 – 3.5 points)
Unsatisfactory (0 – 3.0points)
Name
Rating
Date
Name
of
the
rater
Peer Evaluation Form For Anonymous Evaluations with No Criteria Provided
Peer evaluation

Write down the identification numbers of the students whose works you received to
evaluate (including your own). Do not use your school ID or social security number. To
ensure anonymity of grades and personal information, make use of the identification
numbers provided by the instructor (you can find these identification numbers at the top
of the essays provided in the package for your evaluation). Your personal ID# is written
at the top of the copy of your essay. Then, next to each person’s ID write the word and
the grade from the following list that best describes that person’s work:

Excellent (4.5 - 5 points)
Good (4.0 – 4.5 points)
Ordinary (3.5 – 4.0 points)
Marginal (3.0 – 3.5 points)
Unsatisfactory (0 – 3.0points)
Name
Rating
Date
Identification number of the rater


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 24   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.