 |
Self and Peer Evaluation in Undergraduate Education: When Promises are Worth Risking the Perils
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
24
Marcus, H. and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-252 as referred to in Kunda 2001 Occhipinti, John D. (2003). “Active and accountable: teaching comparative politics using cooperative team learning.” Political Science and Politics 36 (January):69-75
Ohland, Matthew W. and Richard A. Layton. (2000). “Comparing the Reliability of Two Peer Evaluation Instruments” http://www.succeed.ufl.edu/papers/00/00072.pdf Oldfield, Keith A. and Macalpine, Mark K. (1995). “Peer and self-assessment at tertiary level – an experiential report,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol20(1), 125 as referred in Zariski 2001 Pescosolido, Bernice A. and Ronald Aminzde (eds.). (1999). The Social Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in A New Century. Pine Forge Press Stefani, Lorrain J. (1992). “Comparison of collaborative self, peer and tutor assessment in a biochemistry practical,” Biochemical Education, vol. 20(3), 148 as referred in Zariski 2001 Stefani, Lorrain J. (1995). “Peer, self and total assessment: relative reliabilities,” Studies in Higher Education, 19(1):69-75 as referred to in Bostock 2001 Stover, Robert V. (1976). “The impact of self-grading on performance and evaluation in a constitutional law course.” Teaching Political Science, vol.3(3), 303 Tetlock, P.E. and Kim, J.I. (1987). Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700-709 as referred to in Kunda 2001 Van Duzer, Eric and Flora McMartin, Building Better Teamwork Assessment: A Process for Improving the Validity and Sensibility of Self/Peer Ratings. Proceedings, ASEE Conference Wills, Thomas Ashby. (1981). “Downward Comparison Principles in Social Pshychology,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.90, No.2, 245-271 Zariski, Archie. (1996). “Student Peer Assessment in Tertiary Education: Promise, Perils and Parctice” in Abbot, J. and Willcoxson, L. (eds.) Teaching and Learning Within and Across Disciplines, p.189-200. Proceedings of the 5
th
Annual Teaching Learning Forum,
Murdoch Univerisy, February 1996. Perth: Murdoch University.
http://cea.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1996/zariski.html
|
| | Authors: Omelicheva, Mariya. |
|
| |
|
|
24
Marcus, H. and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition,
emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-252 as referred to in Kunda
2001
Occhipinti, John D. (2003). “Active and accountable: teaching comparative politics using
cooperative team learning.” Political Science and Politics 36 (January):69-75
Ohland, Matthew W. and Richard A. Layton. (2000). “Comparing the Reliability of Two
Peer Evaluation Instruments” http://www.succeed.ufl.edu/papers/00/00072.pdf
Oldfield, Keith A. and Macalpine, Mark K. (1995). “Peer and self-assessment at tertiary
level – an experiential report,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol
20(1), 125 as referred in Zariski 2001
Pescosolido, Bernice A. and Ronald Aminzde (eds.). (1999). The Social Worlds of
Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in A New Century. Pine Forge Press
Stefani, Lorrain J. (1992). “Comparison of collaborative self, peer and tutor assessment in
a biochemistry practical,” Biochemical Education, vol. 20(3), 148 as referred in Zariski
2001
Stefani, Lorrain J. (1995). “Peer, self and total assessment: relative reliabilities,” Studies
in Higher Education, 19(1):69-75 as referred to in Bostock 2001
Stover, Robert V. (1976). “The impact of self-grading on performance and evaluation in a
constitutional law course.” Teaching Political Science, vol.3(3), 303
Tetlock, P.E. and Kim, J.I. (1987). Accountability and judgment processes in a
personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700-709 as
referred to in Kunda 2001
Van Duzer, Eric and Flora McMartin, Building Better Teamwork Assessment: A Process
for Improving the Validity and Sensibility of Self/Peer Ratings. Proceedings, ASEE
Conference
Wills, Thomas Ashby. (1981). “Downward Comparison Principles in Social
Pshychology,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.90, No.2, 245-271
Zariski, Archie. (1996). “Student Peer Assessment in Tertiary Education: Promise, Perils
and Parctice” in Abbot, J. and Willcoxson, L. (eds.) Teaching and Learning Within and
Across Disciplines, p.189-200. Proceedings of the 5
th
Annual Teaching Learning Forum,
Murdoch Univerisy, February 1996. Perth: Murdoch University.
http://cea.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf1996/zariski.html
|
|
 Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
