All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Assessing the Department through Classroom Peer-Evaluation
Unformatted Document Text:  19 EVALUATING SEMINAR PARTICIPATION SKILLS Dr. MD Deardorff PO 105 American Politics for Majors Student Name:________________________________ How difficult is the material discussed today _______ 1-5 1= very difficult 5= very simple Rate the individual in each category using the following scale: 2= frequently, 1= sometimes, 0 = not yet, NA = not applicable Skills Demonstrated Self- Assessment ColleagueAssessment ColleagueAssessment ProfessorAssessment Do you stay on task with the discussion?Do you relate your comments to, and support your position with textual evidence ?Do you relate the prior knowledge that enabled you to make a textual conclusion?Can you connect materials from the different texts to each other?Do you listen carefully to others’ ideas and contributions?Do you ask questions that help you understand what the speaker is trying to say?Do you respond equally to people of both genders? Do you enable others to contribute equally to the dialogue?Do you relate your ideas to previous contributions? Do you remain open-minded to ideas that are quite different from yours?Do you avoid subjective opinions that could not be subjected to reasoned judgment? Total Additional Comments: Self-Assessment: Evaluator I: Evaluator II: Professor:

Authors: Deardorff, Michelle.
first   previous   Page 20 of 24   next   last



background image
19
EVALUATING SEMINAR PARTICIPATION SKILLS
Dr. MD Deardorff
PO 105 American Politics for Majors
Student Name:________________________________
How difficult is the material discussed today _______
1-5
1= very difficult 5= very simple
Rate the individual in each category using the following scale:
2= frequently, 1= sometimes, 0 = not yet, NA = not applicable
Skills Demonstrated
Self-
Assessment
Colleague
Assessment
Colleague
Assessment
Professor
Assessment
Do you stay on task with the discussion?
Do you relate your comments to, and support your
position with textual evidence ?
Do you relate the prior knowledge that enabled you to
make a textual conclusion?
Can you connect materials from the different texts to
each other?
Do you listen carefully to others’ ideas and
contributions?
Do you ask questions that help you understand what
the speaker is trying to say?
Do you respond equally to people of both genders?
Do you enable others to contribute equally to the
dialogue?
Do you relate your ideas to previous contributions?
Do you remain open-minded to ideas that are quite
different from yours?
Do you avoid subjective opinions that could not be
subjected to reasoned judgment?
Total
Additional Comments:
Self-Assessment:
Evaluator I:
Evaluator II:
Professor:


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 20 of 24   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.