 |
Schisms, breaks, and islands - seeking bridges over troubled water
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
stuck their professional perspective even where it does not apply, the latter by refusing to get involved in "content" even where it is urgently needed. Until this split is repaired, education administrators can rest assured that there is no need to hurry.
3.3 New Directions
A more positive impact on the educational scene, especially as regards mathematics, comes through outside initiatives by the private sector (cf.
http://www.mint-ec.de
) and various support programms
offered by foundations (cf.
http://www.nat-working.de
). Implicitly, these programmes contain a
belief in progress through paradigmatic change: research scientists transmitting science in schools, professional teachers on leave to act as serious participants in university research teams, students in mixed teams sharing learning experiences with teachers and having direct contact with professional researchers, and so on. Emotional benefits and social contacts are, of course, part of the plan.
The goal of the most ambitious private sector initiative, known as MINT (M = mathematics, I =
informatics, i.e., computer science, N = natural science, T = technology), is to identify schools which are particularly innovative and effective in mathematics and science teaching, and to give them special support and public status. Today almost 100 schools carry the challenging, non-permanent designation as Centers of Excellence for MINT. In these schools, teachers as well as students are given special opportunities to develop their mathematical interests; in-service training courses, for instance, can be organized at a high level. Moreover, the sponsors aim at enhancing the teachers’ all too often low esteem of their own work by providing generous furnishings and equipment. There are, after all, not only talented and highly motivated students, but teachers cut of exactly the same cloth, and any encouragement of them has an immediately multiplied effect on the whole system.
Unless special efforts are made, these currents could easily by-pass both professional
mathematics and mathematics education, the former because of its innate hermeticism, the latter because of its redundancy in an environment which addresses teachers and students directly, without mediation. For mathematics, this would mean putting its practical foot forward: much of what is actually used in industry is within comfortable reach of even the "purest" abstract mathematician. Care would have to be taken to show this foot as clearly belonging to a larger body with many more attractions. Similarly, educators would be called upon to turn toward the "applied" aspect of their discipline, i.e., pedagogy and communication, and also seize the opportunity to open windows showing aspects of the social sciences. If the two communities rise to this occasion, it could be the beginning of building a durable bridge -- around which mathematicology and educational mathematics might grow as well.
At the moment, even the professional societies -- who began the schisms -- seem to come
around to a new way of thinking. They realize that, all across Germany, the problem is too massive and too serious to allow small groups any chance of effecting socially significant changes. The separations of the past are now to be at least partially reversed. Nevertheless, a certain hesitancy and fear of being reabsorbed is palpable among mathematics educators, while mathematicians seem to welcome all the pedagogical help they can get, as long as -- noli tangere circulos meos -- they get enough time to indulge their brains.
References Atiyah, M.F. (1978). The unity of mathematics. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10, 69 - 76. Bass, H. (1997). Mathematicians as Educators. Notices of the American Mathematical Society (AMS) 44 (1), 18 - 21. Berliner, D.C. (2001). Educational Research: The hardest science at all. Educational Researcher 31, 18 - 20. Courant, R.; Robbins, H. & Stewart, I. (1996). What is Mathematics? An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods.
Corby: Oxford University Press.
Cobb, P. & al. 1991. Analogies from the philosophy and sociology of science for understanding classroom life. Sci.
Educ. 75 (1), 23 - 44.
Cobb, P. & Bauersfeld, H. (1995). Introduction: The Coordination of Psychological and Sociological Perspectives in
Mathematics Education. In P. Cobb; H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning (pp. 1 - 16). Malusah (NJ): Erlbaum Lawrence.
|
| | Authors: Toerner, Guenter. and Hoechsmann, Klaus. |
|
| |
|
|
stuck their professional perspective even where it does not apply, the latter by refusing to get involved in "content" even where it is urgently needed. Until this split is repaired, education administrators can rest assured that there is no need to hurry.
3.3 New Directions
A more positive impact on the educational scene, especially as regards mathematics, comes through outside initiatives by the private sector (cf.
http://www.mint-ec.de
) and various support programms
offered by foundations (cf.
http://www.nat-working.de
). Implicitly, these programmes contain a
belief in progress through paradigmatic change: research scientists transmitting science in schools, professional teachers on leave to act as serious participants in university research teams, students in mixed teams sharing learning experiences with teachers and having direct contact with professional researchers, and so on. Emotional benefits and social contacts are, of course, part of the plan.
The goal of the most ambitious private sector initiative, known as MINT (M = mathematics, I =
informatics, i.e., computer science, N = natural science, T = technology), is to identify schools which are particularly innovative and effective in mathematics and science teaching, and to give them special support and public status. Today almost 100 schools carry the challenging, non- permanent designation as Centers of Excellence for MINT. In these schools, teachers as well as students are given special opportunities to develop their mathematical interests; in-service training courses, for instance, can be organized at a high level. Moreover, the sponsors aim at enhancing the teachers’ all too often low esteem of their own work by providing generous furnishings and equipment. There are, after all, not only talented and highly motivated students, but teachers cut of exactly the same cloth, and any encouragement of them has an immediately multiplied effect on the whole system.
Unless special efforts are made, these currents could easily by-pass both professional
mathematics and mathematics education, the former because of its innate hermeticism, the latter because of its redundancy in an environment which addresses teachers and students directly, without mediation. For mathematics, this would mean putting its practical foot forward: much of what is actually used in industry is within comfortable reach of even the "purest" abstract mathematician. Care would have to be taken to show this foot as clearly belonging to a larger body with many more attractions. Similarly, educators would be called upon to turn toward the "applied" aspect of their discipline, i.e., pedagogy and communication, and also seize the opportunity to open windows showing aspects of the social sciences. If the two communities rise to this occasion, it could be the beginning of building a durable bridge -- around which mathematicology and educational mathematics might grow as well.
At the moment, even the professional societies -- who began the schisms -- seem to come
around to a new way of thinking. They realize that, all across Germany, the problem is too massive and too serious to allow small groups any chance of effecting socially significant changes. The separations of the past are now to be at least partially reversed. Nevertheless, a certain hesitancy and fear of being reabsorbed is palpable among mathematics educators, while mathematicians seem to welcome all the pedagogical help they can get, as long as -- noli tangere circulos meos -- they get enough time to indulge their brains.
References Atiyah, M.F. (1978). The unity of mathematics. Bull. London Math. Soc. 10, 69 - 76. Bass, H. (1997). Mathematicians as Educators. Notices of the American Mathematical Society (AMS) 44 (1), 18 - 21. Berliner, D.C. (2001). Educational Research: The hardest science at all. Educational Researcher 31, 18 - 20. Courant, R.; Robbins, H. & Stewart, I. (1996). What is Mathematics? An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods.
Corby: Oxford University Press.
Cobb, P. & al. 1991. Analogies from the philosophy and sociology of science for understanding classroom life. Sci.
Educ. 75 (1), 23 - 44.
Cobb, P. & Bauersfeld, H. (1995). Introduction: The Coordination of Psychological and Sociological Perspectives in
Mathematics Education. In P. Cobb; H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning (pp. 1 - 16). Malusah (NJ): Erlbaum Lawrence.
|
|
Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|