All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

From Primitive Knowing to Formalising: The Role of Student-to-Student Questioning in the Development of Mathematical Understanding
Unformatted Document Text:  FROM PRIMITIVE KNOWING TO FORMALISING: THE ROLE OF STUDENT-TO-STUDENT QUESTIONING IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL UNDERSTANDING Lisa Warner RobertaY. Schorr ## email not listed ## ## email not listed ## Rutgers University-Newark In this paper, we examine the development of inner city middle school students’ ideas and the student-to-student interactions and questions that contribute to this development within the context of the Pirie/Kieren model. We analyze data collected from an inquiry oriented, problem based mathematics class in which students were repeatedly challenged to explain their thinking to each other, and defend and justify all solutions. In this instance, we document how one student was able to move from primitive knowing to formalising. Further, we note that this student (and her classmates) were able to use this knowledge several months later when solving a structurally similar problem. OBJECTIVES/PURPOSES Prompting students to talk about mathematics is an important goal of education (NCTM 2000; Sfard, 2000; Dorfler, 2000; Cobb, Boufi, McClain, and Whiteneck, 1997). Cobb, (2000) notes that student exchanges with others can constitute a significant mechanism by which they modify their mathematical meanings. Carpenter and Lehrer, (1999) state that “the ability to communicate or articulate one’s ideas is an important goal of education, and it also is a benchmark of understanding.” (p. 22) Researchers such as those cited above (and others, see for example, Schorr, 2003; Maher, 2002; Shafer and Romberg, 1999) maintain that it is important to provide students with opportunities to discuss their ideas with each other, defend and justify their thinking both orally and in writing and reflect upon the mathematical thinking of others. One important component of this involves students’ questioning the mathematical thinking of their peers. This report focuses on the impact of student questioning on the development of mathematical thinking. We do this within the context of the Pirie/Kieren theory for the growth of mathematical understanding (Pirie and Kieren, 1994). Our central premise is that when students have the opportunity to question each other about their mathematical ideas, both the questioner and the questioned have the opportunity to move beyond their initial or intermediate conceptualizations about the mathematical ideas involved. As students reflect on their own thinking in response to questions that are posed by their peers they have the opportunity to revise, refine, and extend their ways of thinking about the mathematics. As they do this, their earlier conceptualizations and representations become increasingly refined and linked. We stress the role of representations in this dynamic since “the ways in which mathematical ideas are represented is fundamental to how people can understand and use those ideas.” (NCTM, p.67) In this paper, we will trace the development of ideas (using the Pirie/Kieren model) and the student-to-student interactions and questions that contribute to this development. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK In 1988, Pirie discussed the idea of using categories in characterizing the growth of understanding, observing understanding as a whole dynamic process and not as a single or multi-valued acquisition, nor as a linear combination of knowledge categories. In 1994, Pirie & Kieren described eight potential layers or distinct modes within the growth of understanding for a specific person, on any specific topic. The inner-most layer, called primitive knowing, is what a person can do initially and is the starting place for the growth of any particular mathematical understanding. When a person is doing something to get the idea

Authors: Warner, Lisa. and Schorr, Roberta.
first   previous   Page 1 of 8   next   last



background image
FROM PRIMITIVE KNOWING TO FORMALISING:
THE ROLE OF STUDENT-TO-STUDENT QUESTIONING IN THE
DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL UNDERSTANDING
Lisa Warner
RobertaY. Schorr
## email not listed ##
## email not listed ##
Rutgers University-Newark
In this paper, we examine the development of inner city middle school students’ ideas and the
student-to-student interactions and questions that contribute to this development within the
context of the Pirie/Kieren model. We analyze data collected from
an inquiry oriented,
problem based mathematics class in which students were repeatedly challenged to explain
their thinking to each other, and defend and justify all solutions. In this instance, we
document how one student was able to move from primitive knowing to formalising. Further,
we note that this student (and her classmates) were able to use this knowledge several months
later when solving a structurally similar problem.
OBJECTIVES/PURPOSES
Prompting students to talk about mathematics is an important goal of education (NCTM
2000; Sfard, 2000; Dorfler, 2000; Cobb, Boufi, McClain, and Whiteneck, 1997). Cobb,
(2000) notes that student exchanges with others can constitute a significant mechanism by
which they modify their mathematical meanings. Carpenter and Lehrer, (1999) state that “the
ability to communicate or articulate one’s ideas is an important goal of education, and it also
is a benchmark of understanding.” (p. 22) Researchers such as those cited above (and others,
see for example, Schorr, 2003; Maher, 2002; Shafer and Romberg, 1999) maintain that it is
important to provide students with opportunities to discuss their ideas with each other, defend
and justify their thinking both orally and in writing and reflect upon the mathematical
thinking of others. One important component of this involves students’ questioning the
mathematical thinking of their peers. This report focuses on the impact of student questioning
on the development of mathematical thinking. We do this within the context of the
Pirie/Kieren theory for the growth of mathematical understanding (Pirie and Kieren, 1994).
Our central premise is that when students have the opportunity to question each other
about their mathematical ideas, both the questioner and the questioned have the opportunity
to move beyond their initial or intermediate conceptualizations about the mathematical ideas
involved. As students reflect on their own thinking in response to questions that are posed by
their peers they have the opportunity to revise, refine, and extend their ways of thinking about
the mathematics. As they do this, their earlier conceptualizations and representations become
increasingly refined and linked. We stress the role of representations in this dynamic since
“the ways in which mathematical ideas are represented is fundamental to how people can
understand and use those ideas.” (NCTM, p.67) In this paper, we will trace the development
of ideas (using the Pirie/Kieren model) and the student-to-student interactions and questions
that contribute to this development.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
In 1988, Pirie discussed the idea of using categories in characterizing the growth of
understanding, observing understanding as a whole dynamic process and not as a single or
multi-valued acquisition, nor as a linear combination of knowledge categories.
In 1994, Pirie
& Kieren described eight potential layers or distinct modes within the growth of
understanding for a specific person, on any specific topic. The inner-most layer, called
primitive knowing, is what a person can do initially and is the starting place for the growth of
any particular mathematical understanding. When a person is doing something to get the idea


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 8   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.