 |
Drawing on Diverse Social and Cultural Resources in Technology-Mediated Classrooms
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
1
Drawing on Diverse Social, Cultural, and Academic Resources in Technology-Mediated
Classrooms
Nancy Ares, University of Rochester, Nancy.## email not listed ##
Walter M. Stroup, The University of Texas at Austin, ## email not listed ##
Numerous classroom technologies are being designed to support construction of mathematics
and science knowledge (cf., Kaput & Hegedus, 2002; Linn & Hsi, 2000; Soloway et al., 2001; Wilensky & Stroup, 1999), but largely without regard to the social and cultural resources traditionally under-served students bring to classrooms. Carol Lee (2003) notes, “the tremendous funding being invested in the development of such computer-based tools in education may be simply reinforcing current inequities in opportunities to learn, unintentionally widening the achievement gap” (p. 58). There is little hope of attending to that gap if research and development efforts ignore issues of culture. However, with few exceptions (Lee, 2003; Pinkard, 2001), research and design in instructional technologies has not treated underserved students’ social, cultural, and academic resources as central considerations.
To build understanding of the influence of culture on technology-supported classroom
learning, we turn to a growing body of promising work that treats underserved students’ cultural backgrounds and practices as important resources for learning (cf., C. Lee, 2001; Greenberg & Moll, 1990; Gonzalez et al., 1995). Okhee Lee (2003) argues that equity is unattainable if students are not given access to powerful discourses, but that appropriation of discourse is made more difficult if school science (and mathematics) is simply imposed on students. Appropriation is better supported by drawing on students’ social and cultural practices as resources rather than as barriers to overcome (cf., Civil & Kahn, 2001; Moll & Gonzalez, 1995). For example, Haitian Creole students’ story-telling and argumentation skills have been shown to support their engagement in science (Warren et al., 1992) and irony, satire, and metaphor in African American Vernacular English to scaffold students’ analysis of canonical literary works (C. Lee, 2001).
We examine the unique potential of a next-generation networked classroom technology
(HubNet and Participatory Simulations, Wilensky & Stroup, 1999) to draw on students’ cultural, social, and academic resources to support learning in mathematics. We attend to both (1) content and representations of content; and (2) the participation/interaction of students as dual dimensions of the social space of classrooms. Attending to these dual dimensions highlights “ a generative, creative tension between the structuring role of math and science and the structuring role of social activity” (Stroup, Ares, & Hurford, in press). Of particular interest are the following research questions: (1) In what unique ways does network-mediated activity scaffold learning for underserved
students?
(2) How is mathematical knowledge and practice enhanced through inclusion of underserved
students’ social and cultural resources in network-mediated learning?
Examining these issues will deepen our understanding of the construction of mathematical content and practice through social interaction. We hope to identify effective ways to begin to close the achievement gaps between cultural, social, and economic groups by broadening the range of tools and knowledge teachers use to allow all students to reach their highest potential. Network Mediated Learning
HubNet and Participatory Simulations includes a wireless network of graphing calculators,
being developed with funding from the National Science Foundation and Texas Instruments (Wilensky & Stroup, 1999, 2000). In Participatory Simulations, participants act as individual agents and observe how the behavior of the system as a whole emerges from their individual behaviors. The emergent results become the focus of in-class discussion and analysis. In the
|
| | Authors: Ares, Nancy. and Stroup, Walter. |
|
| |
|
|
1
Drawing on Diverse Social, Cultural, and Academic Resources in Technology-Mediated
Classrooms
Nancy Ares, University of Rochester, Nancy.## email not listed ##
Walter M. Stroup, The University of Texas at Austin, ## email not listed ##
Numerous classroom technologies are being designed to support construction of mathematics
and science knowledge (cf., Kaput & Hegedus, 2002; Linn & Hsi, 2000; Soloway et al., 2001; Wilensky & Stroup, 1999), but largely without regard to the social and cultural resources traditionally under-served students bring to classrooms. Carol Lee (2003) notes, “the tremendous funding being invested in the development of such computer-based tools in education may be simply reinforcing current inequities in opportunities to learn, unintentionally widening the achievement gap” (p. 58). There is little hope of attending to that gap if research and development efforts ignore issues of culture. However, with few exceptions (Lee, 2003; Pinkard, 2001), research and design in instructional technologies has not treated underserved students’ social, cultural, and academic resources as central considerations.
To build understanding of the influence of culture on technology-supported classroom
learning, we turn to a growing body of promising work that treats underserved students’ cultural backgrounds and practices as important resources for learning (cf., C. Lee, 2001; Greenberg & Moll, 1990; Gonzalez et al., 1995). Okhee Lee (2003) argues that equity is unattainable if students are not given access to powerful discourses, but that appropriation of discourse is made more difficult if school science (and mathematics) is simply imposed on students. Appropriation is better supported by drawing on students’ social and cultural practices as resources rather than as barriers to overcome (cf., Civil & Kahn, 2001; Moll & Gonzalez, 1995). For example, Haitian Creole students’ story-telling and argumentation skills have been shown to support their engagement in science (Warren et al., 1992) and irony, satire, and metaphor in African American Vernacular English to scaffold students’ analysis of canonical literary works (C. Lee, 2001).
We examine the unique potential of a next-generation networked classroom technology
(HubNet and Participatory Simulations, Wilensky & Stroup, 1999) to draw on students’ cultural, social, and academic resources to support learning in mathematics. We attend to both (1) content and representations of content; and (2) the participation/interaction of students as dual dimensions of the social space of classrooms. Attending to these dual dimensions highlights “ a generative, creative tension between the structuring role of math and science and the structuring role of social activity” (Stroup, Ares, & Hurford, in press). Of particular interest are the following research questions: (1) In what unique ways does network-mediated activity scaffold learning for underserved
students?
(2) How is mathematical knowledge and practice enhanced through inclusion of underserved
students’ social and cultural resources in network-mediated learning?
Examining these issues will deepen our understanding of the construction of mathematical content and practice through social interaction. We hope to identify effective ways to begin to close the achievement gaps between cultural, social, and economic groups by broadening the range of tools and knowledge teachers use to allow all students to reach their highest potential. Network Mediated Learning
HubNet and Participatory Simulations includes a wireless network of graphing calculators,
being developed with funding from the National Science Foundation and Texas Instruments (Wilensky & Stroup, 1999, 2000). In Participatory Simulations, participants act as individual agents and observe how the behavior of the system as a whole emerges from their individual behaviors. The emergent results become the focus of in-class discussion and analysis. In the
|
|
Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|