 |
Learning to teach preservice mathematics teachers:
The role of a doctoral course
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
educator.” Another stated: “While I have always wanted to be a teacher educator, I was as surprised as anyone to discover that what I wanted to focus on was math.” And another confessed: “I found myself interested in teaching teachers because I needed a job in graduate school.”
Another theme we examine is the value participants attributed to the “practical” and
“research” aspects of the course, and the ways these activities influenced their thinking and teaching practices. Throughout the course, students had opportunities to analyze syllabi, create and discuss records of teacher educators’ practices (lesson plans, cases, class videos, observations of others’ teaching), and analyze preservice teachers’ work. They also had opportunities to engage in more research-oriented activities, such as reading and analyzing research papers with a focus on mathematics teacher education, designing and conducting a research project within their teaching context, and sharing their work with a broader audience through presentations. Understanding our participants’ perceptions of their experiences with these two kinds of activities can shed light on their development processes.
Results
We choose to report by theme rather than by individual case to ensure anonymity of our
students. To that end, we are purposefully unspecific about the research project questions any one student investigated since these projects have been presented at conferences and might become publications. We use clusters of quotes and summarize similar points of views so that no one particular case is revealed. Instead we present the results as a composite case of the common issues experienced by the students. Next we report on preliminary findings from our analysis of the data. First, we report on students’ experiences related to developing a mathematics teacher educator identity; and second on interactions with the teaching and research related activities of the course. To Be or Not to Be! Challenges of Becoming a Mathematics Teacher Educator
Wenger (1998) argues that learning involves the development of identity, the changing of
who we are, in the context of the communities of practice in which we participate. He states: “Because learning transforms who we are and what we can do it is an experience of identity. It is not just an accumulation of skills and information, but a process of becoming–to become a certain person or, conversely, to avoid becoming a certain person” (p. 215). Our identities, then, are shaped by our participation or non-participation in various practices, which in turn shapes our communities of practice. Developing an identity is a constant process of negotiation. “We are always simultaneously dealing with specific situations, participating in the histories of certain practices, and involved in becoming certain persons” (Wenger, 1998, p. 155).
The move from classroom teacher to graduate school is as awkward as any other life event
when the old self moves out of familiar places and practices and into new ones. The graduate students came with varying degrees of experience teaching in K-12 schools (zero to ten years); three had teaching experiences beyond K-12; one taught content courses (in a different subject); another taught teacher education courses outside of the U.S.; and another was a teacher leader who provided professional development to other teachers.
The students differed in teaching assignment (elementary, secondary, not teaching). The
three who were not teaching ‘shadowed’ another instructor throughout the duration of the course. They also differed in the extent to which they identified themselves as ‘math smart’ or ‘math strugglers;’ and in their views on their accomplishments as teachers. Most, regardless of background in mathematics (major, minor, minimal), considered themselves ‘math frauds’—students who had good or hard-earned grades but had never really understood mathematics until some life changing experience with it occurred (during undergraduate studies, in teacher preparation, in professional development) that hooked them into wanting to learn more for themselves and share it with others. Some said they liked mathematics more when they started to teach than when they studied it in school. Regardless of their experiences with mathematics or teaching, each student had come to graduate school because they wanted to learn more about mathematics, research, and/or teaching.
As mentioned earlier, students hesitated to identify themselves as mathematics teacher
educators. In their mathematics education biographies they wrote little about what they
|
| | Authors: Crespo, Sandra. and Speer, Natasha. |
|
| |
|
|
educator.” Another stated: “While I have always wanted to be a teacher educator, I was as surprised as anyone to discover that what I wanted to focus on was math.” And another confessed: “I found myself interested in teaching teachers because I needed a job in graduate school.”
Another theme we examine is the value participants attributed to the “practical” and
“research” aspects of the course, and the ways these activities influenced their thinking and teaching practices. Throughout the course, students had opportunities to analyze syllabi, create and discuss records of teacher educators’ practices (lesson plans, cases, class videos, observations of others’ teaching), and analyze preservice teachers’ work. They also had opportunities to engage in more research-oriented activities, such as reading and analyzing research papers with a focus on mathematics teacher education, designing and conducting a research project within their teaching context, and sharing their work with a broader audience through presentations. Understanding our participants’ perceptions of their experiences with these two kinds of activities can shed light on their development processes.
Results
We choose to report by theme rather than by individual case to ensure anonymity of our
students. To that end, we are purposefully unspecific about the research project questions any one student investigated since these projects have been presented at conferences and might become publications. We use clusters of quotes and summarize similar points of views so that no one particular case is revealed. Instead we present the results as a composite case of the common issues experienced by the students. Next we report on preliminary findings from our analysis of the data. First, we report on students’ experiences related to developing a mathematics teacher educator identity; and second on interactions with the teaching and research related activities of the course. To Be or Not to Be! Challenges of Becoming a Mathematics Teacher Educator
Wenger (1998) argues that learning involves the development of identity, the changing of
who we are, in the context of the communities of practice in which we participate. He states: “Because learning transforms who we are and what we can do it is an experience of identity. It is not just an accumulation of skills and information, but a process of becoming–to become a certain person or, conversely, to avoid becoming a certain person” (p. 215). Our identities, then, are shaped by our participation or non-participation in various practices, which in turn shapes our communities of practice. Developing an identity is a constant process of negotiation. “We are always simultaneously dealing with specific situations, participating in the histories of certain practices, and involved in becoming certain persons” (Wenger, 1998, p. 155).
The move from classroom teacher to graduate school is as awkward as any other life event
when the old self moves out of familiar places and practices and into new ones. The graduate students came with varying degrees of experience teaching in K-12 schools (zero to ten years); three had teaching experiences beyond K-12; one taught content courses (in a different subject); another taught teacher education courses outside of the U.S.; and another was a teacher leader who provided professional development to other teachers.
The students differed in teaching assignment (elementary, secondary, not teaching). The
three who were not teaching ‘shadowed’ another instructor throughout the duration of the course. They also differed in the extent to which they identified themselves as ‘math smart’ or ‘math strugglers;’ and in their views on their accomplishments as teachers. Most, regardless of background in mathematics (major, minor, minimal), considered themselves ‘math frauds’— students who had good or hard-earned grades but had never really understood mathematics until some life changing experience with it occurred (during undergraduate studies, in teacher preparation, in professional development) that hooked them into wanting to learn more for themselves and share it with others. Some said they liked mathematics more when they started to teach than when they studied it in school. Regardless of their experiences with mathematics or teaching, each student had come to graduate school because they wanted to learn more about mathematics, research, and/or teaching.
As mentioned earlier, students hesitated to identify themselves as mathematics teacher
educators. In their mathematics education biographies they wrote little about what they
|
|
Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|