All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

“Teaching how one was taught:” A case of a student from reform-oriented schooling implementing traditional instructional practices
Unformatted Document Text:  In addition, he believed (from conversations with colleagues) that posing challenging problems generated frustration and negative student reactions. He also thought it was inappropriate to “put students on the spot” by asking for explanations since that could be interpreted as confrontational. He believed his role was to present rules and solve simple problems and that other activities were likely to be criticized by faculty and students. Alex was generally disappointed with his teaching, but believed he just needed to “make clearer presentations” to improve. Since what Alex reported were not the course supervisor’s intentions, I encouraged him to have students work on problems collaboratively and present their solutions. We discussed lesson plans and strategies for engaging students. Since researchers have documented significant difficulties that even strong and experienced teachers have implementing reform-oriented practices, it seemed unlikely that a relatively inexperienced teacher who was struggling as much as Alex would succeed in transforming his practices in a short period of time. Second observation: It was, therefore, quite surprising that during my observation several weeks later, I watched Alex orchestrate dramatically different learning opportunities for his students. The classroom atmosphere was different, as were the ways Alex engaged students. The topic was volume and surface areas of cylinders and cones. Instead of presenting rules and examples, Alex began by discussing shape characteristics and asking for definitions of various figures. Next, he showed paper models and then derived formulas with ideas volunteered by students. For the remaining hour, students worked collaboratively on problems, presented solutions, and engaged in whole-class discussions. Problems involved finding and comparing areas and volumes. All problems entailed use of formulas discussed earlier, but each also required reasoning about shapes both before and after using the formula. Alex’s learning experiences: From our discussions, I discovered that Alex’s teaching practices during my first observation were not ones he had experienced as a learner. He had active learning environments throughout his mathematics schooling and believed he and others had learned well from working on challenging problems together, discussing and presenting their thinking. He believed such environments were “more like how learning math really happens” and that the traditional practices he had tried seemed straightforward, but said he did not actually understand their role in students’ learning. Conclusions Findings suggest that ability to “teach as one was taught” is not limited to those who experienced traditional instruction. Reform-oriented experiences and beliefs appear to be extremely resilient– resilient enough to withstand the influences of several years of teaching in a context that promoted traditional instruction. This resilience is also evidenced by how easily Alex transformed his unsuccessful traditional practices into the more reform-oriented ones with which he was familiar. These findings are encouraging: if the mathematics education community succeeds in helping current teachers develop reform-oriented practices, their students may be powerful levers to successful implementation of reform. References Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to Teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA: Simon & Schuster Macmillan. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327-345. Fennema, E., & Scott Nelson, B. (Eds.). (1997). Mathematics Teachers in Transition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Schifter, D. (1993). Mathematics Process as Mathematics Content: A Course for Teachers. 12, 271-283. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Models of the Teaching Process. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 243-261. Stigler, J., & Heibert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World’s Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York: The Free Press. Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers' Beliefs and Conceptions: A Synthesis of the Research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning.

Authors: Speer, Natasha.
first   previous   Page 2 of 3   next   last



background image
In addition, he believed (from conversations with colleagues) that posing challenging problems
generated frustration and negative student reactions. He also thought it was inappropriate to “put
students on the spot” by asking for explanations since that could be interpreted as confrontational. He
believed his role was to present rules and solve simple problems and that other activities were likely to
be criticized by faculty and students. Alex was generally disappointed with his teaching, but believed he
just needed to “make clearer presentations” to improve. Since what Alex reported were not the course
supervisor’s intentions, I encouraged him to have students work on problems collaboratively and present
their solutions. We discussed lesson plans and strategies for engaging students. Since researchers have
documented significant difficulties that even strong and experienced teachers have implementing
reform-oriented practices, it seemed unlikely that a relatively inexperienced teacher who was struggling
as much as Alex would succeed in transforming his practices in a short period of time.
Second observation: It was, therefore, quite surprising that during my observation several weeks
later, I watched Alex orchestrate dramatically different learning opportunities for his students. The
classroom atmosphere was different, as were the ways Alex engaged students. The topic was volume
and surface areas of cylinders and cones. Instead of presenting rules and examples, Alex began by
discussing shape characteristics and asking for definitions of various figures. Next, he showed paper
models and then derived formulas with ideas volunteered by students. For the remaining hour, students
worked collaboratively on problems, presented solutions, and engaged in whole-class discussions.
Problems involved finding and comparing areas and volumes. All problems entailed use of formulas
discussed earlier, but each also required reasoning about shapes both before and after using the formula.
Alex’s learning experiences: From our discussions, I discovered that Alex’s teaching practices
during my first observation were not ones he had experienced as a learner. He had active learning
environments throughout his mathematics schooling and believed he and others had learned well from
working on challenging problems together, discussing and presenting their thinking. He believed such
environments were “more like how learning math really happens” and that the traditional practices he
had tried seemed straightforward, but said he did not actually understand their role in students’ learning.
Conclusions
Findings suggest that ability to “teach as one was taught” is not limited to those who experienced
traditional instruction. Reform-oriented experiences and beliefs appear to be extremely resilient–
resilient enough to withstand the influences of several years of teaching in a context that promoted
traditional instruction. This resilience is also evidenced by how easily Alex transformed his unsuccessful
traditional practices into the more reform-oriented ones with which he was familiar. These findings are
encouraging: if the mathematics education community succeeds in helping current teachers develop
reform-oriented practices, their students may be powerful levers to successful implementation of reform.
References
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to Teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.),
Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Macmillan Library Reference
USA: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Cohen, D. K. (1990). A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327-345.
Fennema, E., & Scott Nelson, B. (Eds.). (1997). Mathematics Teachers in Transition. Mahwah, New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schifter, D. (1993). Mathematics Process as Mathematics Content: A Course for Teachers. 12, 271-283.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Models of the Teaching Process. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3),
243-261.
Stigler, J., & Heibert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World’s Teachers for Improving
Education in the Classroom. New York: The Free Press.
Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers' Beliefs and Conceptions: A Synthesis of the Research. In D. Grouws
(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning.


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 3   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.