Citation

The Divergent Series: Why Lower Courts will Narrow Fourth Amendment Protections and Allow Fundamental Freedoms to be Sacrificed in the Name of Perceived Exigency after Grady v. North Carolina

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Similar Titles



Abstract:

In Grady v. North Carolina, the Supreme Court allowed a two-time sex offender to challenge the use of a global positioning system (GPS) tracking device as a violation of his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
In light of two earlier decisions, United States v. Jones, and Florida v. Jardines, the Supreme Court said that “[t]he reasonableness of a search depends on the totality of the circumstances, including the nature and purpose of the search and the extent to which the search intrudes upon reasonable privacy expectations.” The Supreme Court did not determine that Satellite Based Monitoring programs (SBM) are overall unconstitutional and instead left that decision to state courts. This paper will examine prior court decisions that allow governmental interests to override sex offender rights, the reasonableness of an offender’s expectation of privacy and recent studies on sex offender recidivism to analyze and project how future courts will rule on this issue.
Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Society of Criminology
URL:
http://www.asc41.com


Citation:
URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1279072_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Cucolo, Heather. "The Divergent Series: Why Lower Courts will Narrow Fourth Amendment Protections and Allow Fundamental Freedoms to be Sacrificed in the Name of Perceived Exigency after Grady v. North Carolina" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, Philadelphia, PA, Nov 14, 2017 <Not Available>. 2018-06-20 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1279072_index.html>

APA Citation:

Cucolo, H. , 2017-11-14 "The Divergent Series: Why Lower Courts will Narrow Fourth Amendment Protections and Allow Fundamental Freedoms to be Sacrificed in the Name of Perceived Exigency after Grady v. North Carolina" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, Philadelphia, PA <Not Available>. 2018-06-20 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p1279072_index.html

Publication Type: Individual Paper
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: In Grady v. North Carolina, the Supreme Court allowed a two-time sex offender to challenge the use of a global positioning system (GPS) tracking device as a violation of his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
In light of two earlier decisions, United States v. Jones, and Florida v. Jardines, the Supreme Court said that “[t]he reasonableness of a search depends on the totality of the circumstances, including the nature and purpose of the search and the extent to which the search intrudes upon reasonable privacy expectations.” The Supreme Court did not determine that Satellite Based Monitoring programs (SBM) are overall unconstitutional and instead left that decision to state courts. This paper will examine prior court decisions that allow governmental interests to override sex offender rights, the reasonableness of an offender’s expectation of privacy and recent studies on sex offender recidivism to analyze and project how future courts will rule on this issue.


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.