Citation

To Publish or Not Publish: Explaining Publication Areas of Federal Trial Judges

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

This study seeks to address the question of what causes lower court judges to publish decisions in particular areas of case law.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

judg (124), publish (121), decis (97), court (91), case (72), district (63), opinion (61), feder (54), public (49), like (39), variabl (35), area (30), law (28), career (28), u.s (28), issu (27), appeal (25), may (24), also (24), categori (24), suggest (23),
Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: The Midwest Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/


Citation:
URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p139305_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Johnson, Susan. "To Publish or Not Publish: Explaining Publication Areas of Federal Trial Judges" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, Apr 20, 2006 <Not Available>. 2013-12-17 <http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p139305_index.html>

APA Citation:

Johnson, S. W. , 2006-04-20 "To Publish or Not Publish: Explaining Publication Areas of Federal Trial Judges" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois Online <PDF>. 2013-12-17 from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p139305_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: This study seeks to address the question of what causes lower court judges to publish decisions in particular areas of case law.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available The Midwest Political Science Association

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 22
Word count: 5392
Text sample:
To Publish or Not Publish: Explaining Publication Areas of Federal Trial Judges by Susan W. Johnson University of North Carolina at Greensboro Ronald Stidham Appalachian State University Kenneth Manning University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth Robert A. Carp University of Houston Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago IL April 20-23 2006 Abstract This study examines the effects that personal judge attributes career specialization and case specific characteristics have on the decisions of federal
.351 6.070 Law Professor -.519** .193 .869 Economic Policy .681** .246 3.200 Private Law Practice .340 .187 2.027 Case Characteristics: Important Issue .533* .128 2.187 Reversed by Appeals Court .122 .139 1.483 Ideological Congruence -.099 .233 1.430 with Decision Constant -.400 .194 N=1322 *Significant at .05 level Chi2=61.70** **Significant at .01 level Count R2 =.610 Two-tailed tests 22


Similar Titles:
Differences in published versus unpublished decisions on asylum issues in the Courts of Appeals

Just Like The Rest? Examining the Voting Behavior of Cross-Party Appointed Federal Appeals Court Judges


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.