 |
A Model Preservice Program to Prepare Teachers for the "School That Technology Built"
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Clark, T. (2001) Virtual Schools: Trends and issues, report commissioned by the Distance
Learning Resource Network, a WestEd Project; co-sponsored by the Centre for the Application of Information Technologies at Western Illinois University, October [Available online: http://www.dlrn.org/trends.html ]
Cyrs, T. E. (1997). Competence in teaching at a distance. In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.), Teaching and
learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis N.E. (2003). Technology and teacher education in the USA: What makes for good
sustainable practice? Technology, Pedagogy and Learning, 12(10), 59-84.
Davis N. E, Niederhauser, D.S, Compton, L., Lindstrom, D. & Schoeny, Z. (2005.) Virtual
Schooling lab practice: Case studies for teacher preparation. In Crawford, C., Carlsen, R., Gibson, I., McFerrin, K., Price, J., Weber R. & Willis, D.A. (Eds.) Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference Annual. Phoenix, Arizona, USA, March 2005. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education: Charlottesville, VA.
Easton, S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor's role in online distance learning. Communication
Education, 52(2), 87-105.
National Education Association (n.d.). Guide to online high school courses. Washington DC:
National
Education
Association.
Available
online
at
http://www.nea.org/technology/distanceed/highschool
November, A. (2001). Empowering students with technology. Glenville, IL: Skylight.Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Virtual high schools in the United States: Current views, future visions.
In Jo Bradley (ed.), The open classroom: Distance learning in and out of schools. London: Kogan Page.
Roblyer, M. D., & Marshall, J. (2002-2003). Predicting success of virtual high school distance
learners: Preliminary results from an educational success prediction instrument (ESPRI). Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 241-255.
Roblyer, M. D., & McKenzie, B. (2000). Distant but not out-of-touch: What makes an effective
distance learning instructor? Learning and Leading With Technology, 27(6), 50-53.
Setzer, C., Lewis, L., & Greene, B. (2005). Distance education courses for public elementary
and secondary school students: 2002-2003. Report No. NCES 2005-101. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Thompson, A. D., Schmidt, D. A., & Davis, N. E. (2003, January) Technology collaboratives for
simultaneous renewal in teacher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 71-87.
Waits, T., J. Setzer, C., & Lewis, L. (2004). Dual credit and exam-based courses in U.S. public
high schools: 2002–03. Education Statistics Quarterly, 7(1-2). Online at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_7/1_2/4_11.asp
Watson, J.F. (2005). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and
practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
Wood, C. (2005). Highschool.com. Edutopia, 1(4), 32-37.
AACTE Proposal – 4
|
| | Authors: Roblyer, Margaret. and Thompson, Ann. |
|
| |
|
|
Clark, T. (2001) Virtual Schools: Trends and issues, report commissioned by the Distance
Learning Resource Network, a WestEd Project; co-sponsored by the Centre for the
Application of Information Technologies at Western Illinois University, October
[Available online: http://www.dlrn.org/trends.html ]
Cyrs, T. E. (1997). Competence in teaching at a distance. In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.), Teaching and
learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate
programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis N.E. (2003). Technology and teacher education in the USA: What makes for good
sustainable practice? Technology, Pedagogy and Learning, 12(10), 59-84.
Davis N. E, Niederhauser, D.S, Compton, L., Lindstrom, D. & Schoeny, Z. (2005.) Virtual
Schooling lab practice: Case studies for teacher preparation. In Crawford, C., Carlsen, R.,
Gibson, I., McFerrin, K., Price, J., Weber R. & Willis, D.A. (Eds.) Society for
Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference Annual.
Phoenix, Arizona, USA, March 2005. Association for the Advancement of Computing in
Education: Charlottesville, VA.
Easton, S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor's role in online distance learning. Communication
Education, 52(2), 87-105.
National Education Association (n.d.). Guide to online high school courses. Washington DC:
National
Education
Association.
Available
online
at
http://www.nea.org/technology/distanceed/highschool
November, A. (2001). Empowering students with technology. Glenville, IL: Skylight.
Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Virtual high schools in the United States: Current views, future visions.
In Jo Bradley (ed.), The open classroom: Distance learning in and out of schools.
London: Kogan Page.
Roblyer, M. D., & Marshall, J. (2002-2003). Predicting success of virtual high school distance
learners: Preliminary results from an educational success prediction instrument (ESPRI).
Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 241-255.
Roblyer, M. D., & McKenzie, B. (2000). Distant but not out-of-touch: What makes an effective
distance learning instructor? Learning and Leading With Technology, 27(6), 50-53.
Setzer, C., Lewis, L., & Greene, B. (2005). Distance education courses for public elementary
and secondary school students: 2002-2003. Report No. NCES 2005-101. Washington,
DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Thompson, A. D., Schmidt, D. A., & Davis, N. E. (2003, January) Technology collaboratives for
simultaneous renewal in teacher education. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 51(1), 71-87.
Waits, T., J. Setzer, C., & Lewis, L. (2004). Dual credit and exam-based courses in U.S. public
high schools: 2002–03. Education Statistics Quarterly, 7(1-2). Online at:
http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_7/1_2/4_11.asp
Watson, J.F. (2005). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and
practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
Wood, C. (2005). Highschool.com. Edutopia, 1(4), 32-37.
AACTE Proposal – 4
|
|
 Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
