All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Education Students' Views of Online Classes
Unformatted Document Text:  Section II: Outcomes and Methods A. Learner/participant outcomes: Participants will be given raw data and the emerging themes from the data. From this information, they can infer relationships to their own programs, courses, and students to discern implications. Additionally, participants may determine directions for further studies for course/program improvement. B. Methods: This session will include study description, study findings and study implications. This information will be delivered to participants in basically a lecture/discussion format (supported by powerpoint slides) to be followed by a question and discussion period. ReferencesAchacoso, M. (2003). Evaluating Technology and Instruction: Literature review and recommendations. The University of Texas at Austin Division of Instructional Innovation and Assessment. Kimble, C. (1999). The Impact of Technology on Learning: Making Sense of the Research . Policy Brief. Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory. Aurora: Colorado [online]. Available: http://www.mcrel.org/PDFConversion/PolicyBriefs/PB_ImpactTechnology.html Owston, R.D. (1999). Strategies for evaluating Web-based learning. Invited address given to the SIG/Text, Technology, and Learning Strategies at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April 1999. Owston, R.D. (2000). Evaluating Web-based learning environments: Strategies and insights. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(1), 79-87. 34 Shavinina, L., & Loarer, E. (1999). Psychological evaluations of educational multimedia applications. European Psychologist, 4 (1), 33-44. Windschitl, M. (1998). The WWW and classroom research: What path should we take? Educational Researcher 27(1), 28-33. Young, J.W. (2002). Evaluating the impact of technology in college courses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans, 2002.

Authors: Aiken, Irene.
first   previous   Page 3 of 3   next   last



background image
Section II: Outcomes and Methods
A. Learner/participant outcomes: Participants will be given raw data and the emerging
themes from the data. From this information, they can infer relationships to their own
programs, courses, and students to discern implications. Additionally, participants
may determine directions for further studies for course/program improvement.
B. Methods: This session will include study description, study findings and study
implications. This information will be delivered to participants in basically a
lecture/discussion format (supported by powerpoint slides) to be followed by a
question and discussion period.
References
Achacoso, M. (2003). Evaluating Technology and Instruction: Literature review and
recommendations. The University of Texas at Austin Division of Instructional
Innovation and Assessment.
Kimble, C. (1999). The Impact of Technology on Learning: Making Sense of the
Research . Policy Brief. Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory. Aurora:
Colorado [online]. Available:
http://www.mcrel.org/PDFConversion/PolicyBriefs/PB_ImpactTechnology.html
Owston, R.D. (1999). Strategies for evaluating Web-based learning. Invited address
given to the SIG/Text, Technology, and Learning Strategies at the annual meeting
of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April 1999.
Owston, R.D. (2000). Evaluating Web-based learning environments: Strategies and
insights. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3(1), 79-87. 34
Shavinina, L., & Loarer, E. (1999). Psychological evaluations of educational multimedia
applications. European Psychologist, 4 (1), 33-44.
Windschitl, M. (1998). The WWW and classroom research: What path should we take?
Educational Researcher 27(1), 28-33.
Young, J.W. (2002). Evaluating the impact of technology in college courses. Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research
Association , New Orleans, 2002.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 3   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.