 |
Need, Bargaining, or Efficiency Driven? Explaining Central-Local Fiscal Transfers in Post-Reform China
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Need, Bargaining, or Efficiency Driven?
Explaining Central-Local Fiscal Transfers in Post-Reform China
Jing Vivian Zhan
Department of Political Science
University of California, Los Angeles
## email not listed ##
Prepared for delivery at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 3, 2006. Copyright by the American Political Science Association.
Abstract
An examination of China’s central-provincial fiscal transfers in the post-reform era
shows a pattern of wild cross-regional variations: some provinces submitted huge amounts of revenue to the center; while other provinces received considerable central subsidies. Why did some provinces enjoy more fiscal power than others? The need-based and bargaining-based theories have provided different hypotheses to explain such cross-regional variations. But in this paper I argue that both theories fall short of telling the whole story about central-local fiscal transfers in China. An alternative explanation is that the Chinese central government tended to make larger fiscal transfers to localities that used their revenues more efficiently and achieved higher economic development level. In this way, fiscal transfer essentially functioned as an investment: By transferring more fiscal revenues to localities where they could be efficiently used to yield high returns, the center could harvest more fiscal revenue in the future.
|
| | Authors: Zhan, J. Vivian. |
|
| |
|
|
Need, Bargaining, or Efficiency Driven?
Explaining Central-Local Fiscal Transfers in Post-Reform China
Jing Vivian Zhan
Department of Political Science
University of California, Los Angeles
## email not listed ##
Prepared for delivery at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 3, 2006. Copyright by the American Political Science Association.
Abstract
An examination of China’s central-provincial fiscal transfers in the post-reform era
shows a pattern of wild cross-regional variations: some provinces submitted huge amounts of revenue to the center; while other provinces received considerable central subsidies. Why did some provinces enjoy more fiscal power than others? The need-based and bargaining-based theories have provided different hypotheses to explain such cross-regional variations. But in this paper I argue that both theories fall short of telling the whole story about central-local fiscal transfers in China. An alternative explanation is that the Chinese central government tended to make larger fiscal transfers to localities that used their revenues more efficiently and achieved higher economic development level. In this way, fiscal transfer essentially functioned as an investment: By transferring more fiscal revenues to localities where they could be efficiently used to yield high returns, the center could harvest more fiscal revenue in the future.
|
|
Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|