Author's Keywords: incumbent, deterrence, challenger, quality, pork, distributive	Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152324_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Sidman, Andrew. "Campaign Strength: Addressing the Measurement Problem in the Ability of Incumbents to Deter Strong Challengers through Pork Barreling" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 31, 2006 <Not Available>. 2011-03-13 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152324_index.html>

Sidman, A. H. , 2006-08-31 "Campaign Strength: Addressing the Measurement Problem in the Ability of Incumbents to Deter Strong Challengers through Pork Barreling" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2011-03-13 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152324_index.html

Publication Type: Proceeding Abstract: Does pork barreling allow incumbents to prevent the emergence of quality challengers? One of the difficulties inherent in answering this question is that ineffectively measuring quality can bias the effects of distributive spending on election outcomes downward, as noted by Levitt and Snyder (1997). Paradoxically, increases in distributive spending may not be closely linked with the most common measure of quality, electoral experience. I address this problem by rephrasing the question and examining whether distributive spending can cause the challenger’s campaign to be weaker (less popular and have fewer resources at its disposal). To do this, I have created a measure of campaign strength that is a departure from the traditional notions of candidate quality. This measure has stronger predictive power than the use of just electoral experience (although there is a heavy cost to using the measure to predict election outcomes—endogeneity) and distributive spending is shown to have a significant effect on campaign strength. Using the electoral experience measure, however, we would have to conclude that incumbents are not able to deter a strong challenge through the use of distributive benefits, which is a clear misstatement of the benefits distributive spending can give to incumbents.

A Model of Campaign Spending and Challenger Entry in Repeated Elections

A FISTFUL OF EUROS: CAMPAIGN SPENDING EFFECTS UNDER THE SINGLE-TRANSFERABLE VOTE ELECTORAL SYSTEM

Action Learning in Educational Leadership Programs: Benefits and Challenges of Quality Teaching and Learning Experiences