All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Gender Bending: Effects of Strategies in Candidate Websites
Unformatted Document Text:  29 McGraw, Kathleen M., Samuel Best, and Richard Timpone. 1995. "What They Say or What They Do?" The Impact of Elite Explanation and Policy Outcomes on Public Opinion. American Journal of Political Science 39 (1):53-74. McMillan, Sally J., and Jang-Sun Hwang. 2002. Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity. Journal of Advertising 31 (3):29-42. Mendelsohn. 1996. Miller, Arthur H., Martin P. Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk. 1986. Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. The American Political Science Review 80 (2):521-540. Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick. 2000. News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):301-315. Niemi, Richard G., and Herbert F. Weisberg. 1993. Classics in Voting Behavior. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Norris, Pippa. 2003. Paolino, Phillip. 1995. Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections. American Journal of Political Science 39 (2):294-313. Petrocik, John R. 1996. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science 40 (3):825-850. Rahn, Wendy, John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan. 1990. A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal. In Information and Democratic Processes, edited by J. A. Ferejohn and J. H. Kuklinski. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2):472-496. Riker, William H., ed. 1993. Agenda Formation. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1995. The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation. Political Research Quarterly 48 (3):599-611. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon, ed. 2002. Women Transforming Congress. Vol. 506. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Norma G. Dean. 1989. Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13:77-85. Rosenwasser, Shirley M., Robyn R. Rogers, Sheila Fling, Kayla Silvers-Pickens, and John Butemeyer. 1987. Attitudes toward women and men in politics: Perceived male and female candidate competencies and participant personality characteristics. Political Psychology 8 (2):191-200. Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Jana Seale. 1988. Attitudes toward a Hypothetical Male or Female Presidential Candidate - A Research Note. Political Psychology 9 (4):591-598. Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):20-34. Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women. The American Political Science Review 75 (3):701-716. Sapiro, Virginia. 1982. If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images. Political Psychology 3:161-183. Seelye, Katharine Q. 2004. How to Sell a Candidate to a Porsche-Driving, Leno-Loving NASCAR Fan. The New York Times, December 6.

Authors: Schneider, Monica.
first   previous   Page 29 of 30   next   last



background image
29
McGraw, Kathleen M., Samuel Best, and Richard Timpone. 1995. "What They Say or What
They Do?" The Impact of Elite Explanation and Policy Outcomes on Public Opinion.
American Journal of Political Science 39 (1):53-74.
McMillan, Sally J., and Jang-Sun Hwang. 2002. Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An
Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in
Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity. Journal of Advertising 31 (3):29-42.
Mendelsohn. 1996.
Miller, Arthur H., Martin P. Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk. 1986. Schematic Assessments
of Presidential Candidates. The American Political Science Review 80 (2):521-540.
Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick. 2000. News Media Impact on the Ingredients of
Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted
Source. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):301-315.
Niemi, Richard G., and Herbert F. Weisberg. 1993. Classics in Voting Behavior. Washington,
DC: CQ Press.
Norris, Pippa. 2003.
Paolino, Phillip. 1995. Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women
Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections. American Journal of Political Science 39 (2):294-
313.
Petrocik, John R. 1996. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.
American Journal of Political Science 40 (3):825-850.
Rahn, Wendy, John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan. 1990. A Social-Cognitive
Model of Candidate Appraisal. In Information and Democratic Processes, edited by J. A.
Ferejohn and J. H. Kuklinski. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about
Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2):472-496.
Riker, William H., ed. 1993. Agenda Formation.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1995. The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation. Political
Research Quarterly 48 (3):599-611.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon, ed. 2002. Women Transforming Congress. Vol. 506. Norman, OK:
University of Oklahoma Press.
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Norma G. Dean. 1989. Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of
Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office. Psychology of Women
Quarterly
13:77-85.
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., Robyn R. Rogers, Sheila Fling, Kayla Silvers-Pickens, and John
Butemeyer. 1987. Attitudes toward women and men in politics: Perceived male and
female candidate competencies and participant personality characteristics. Political
Psychology
8 (2):191-200.
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Jana Seale. 1988. Attitudes toward a Hypothetical Male or Female
Presidential Candidate - A Research Note. Political Psychology 9 (4):591-598.
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political
Science 46 (1):20-34.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem
of Political Representation of Women. The American Political Science Review 75 (3):701-
716.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1982. If U.S. Senator Baker Were a Woman: An Experimental Study of
Candidate Images. Political Psychology 3:161-183.
Seelye, Katharine Q. 2004. How to Sell a Candidate to a Porsche-Driving, Leno-Loving
NASCAR Fan. The New York Times, December 6.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 30   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.