|
|
|
|
Ideas versus Expertise: Think Tanks and the Organizations of Information in American Policymaking |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The volume and variety of ideas and accompanying policy research available to members of Congress and executive branch officials are enormous and have grown tremendously in the past thirty-five years. For all of the resources invested in the production of this work, there is remarkably little evidence of how it is used by policymakers to inspire, formulate, or improve the content of public policy (Shulock 1999, Rich and Weaver 1998, Whiteman 1985, 1995). It is well established that expertise can be influential in agenda-setting (Kingdon 1995, Baumgartner and Jones 1993) and that ideas can inform the direction of policy change (Derthick and Quirk 1985, Hall 1989, Campbell 2004). But how does that happen? And what are the differences between ideas and expertise and among the types of expertise and ideas made available to policymakers?
In this paper, I examine how public policy think tanks package and present their ideas and research to inform and influence policymakers. I analyze, in particular, how the greatly expanded number of nonprofit think tanks have deliberately organized in ways to cater to demands from policymakers for supportive rather than original material. Aggressive marketing strategies have become dominant across the range of organizations involved in providing research in national policymaking (Rich 2004). And a tension has developed between the provision of ideas versus expertise by think tanks (Rich 2005).
The analysis draws on new data from a national survey of think tank leaders who take different approaches to producing and promoting their work. I combine these findings with qualitative findings from 65 new interviews with those at research organizations and those that support them at private foundations and within government. A major portion of the paper explores the relationships between funders and researchers and the effects of these relationships on how think tanks seek to promote ideas and expertise in American policymaking. The paper reveals a diversity of strategies for how ideas and expertise achieve traction in policymaking. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
think (226), tank (219), idea (158), conserv (129), liber (121), research (93), polit (92), polici (84), organ (75), ideolog (61), work (58), leader (47), policymak (47), differ (46), import (45), public (41), new (39), state (38), american (38), progress (36), interest (36), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Rich, Andrew. "Ideas versus Expertise: Think Tanks and the Organizations of Information in American Policymaking" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 31, 2006 <Not Available>. 2011-03-13 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152817_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Rich, A. , 2006-08-31 "Ideas versus Expertise: Think Tanks and the Organizations of Information in American Policymaking" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA Online <PDF>. 2011-03-13 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p152817_index.html |
Publication Type: Proceeding Abstract: The volume and variety of ideas and accompanying policy research available to members of Congress and executive branch officials are enormous and have grown tremendously in the past thirty-five years. For all of the resources invested in the production of this work, there is remarkably little evidence of how it is used by policymakers to inspire, formulate, or improve the content of public policy (Shulock 1999, Rich and Weaver 1998, Whiteman 1985, 1995). It is well established that expertise can be influential in agenda-setting (Kingdon 1995, Baumgartner and Jones 1993) and that ideas can inform the direction of policy change (Derthick and Quirk 1985, Hall 1989, Campbell 2004). But how does that happen? And what are the differences between ideas and expertise and among the types of expertise and ideas made available to policymakers?
In this paper, I examine how public policy think tanks package and present their ideas and research to inform and influence policymakers. I analyze, in particular, how the greatly expanded number of nonprofit think tanks have deliberately organized in ways to cater to demands from policymakers for supportive rather than original material. Aggressive marketing strategies have become dominant across the range of organizations involved in providing research in national policymaking (Rich 2004). And a tension has developed between the provision of ideas versus expertise by think tanks (Rich 2005).
The analysis draws on new data from a national survey of think tank leaders who take different approaches to producing and promoting their work. I combine these findings with qualitative findings from 65 new interviews with those at research organizations and those that support them at private foundations and within government. A major portion of the paper explores the relationships between funders and researchers and the effects of these relationships on how think tanks seek to promote ideas and expertise in American policymaking. The paper reveals a diversity of strategies for how ideas and expertise achieve traction in policymaking. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
22 |
| Word count: |
9493 |
| Text sample: |
| Ideas versus Expertise: Think Tanks and the Organizations of Information in American Policymaking Andrew Rich Department of Political Science City College of New York 160 Convent Ave. NAC 4/126 New York NY 10031 212.650.5440 arich@ccny.cuny.edu This paper is a work-in-progress. Comments are welcome. Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association Conference Philadelphia August 31-September 3 2006. Assessed from any angle conservative ideas appear to be dominating the policy agenda in the United States. They began to |
| Used New and Alternative Media to Take Power. Chicago: Bonus Books. Weaver Richard M. 1971. Ideas Have Consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Weir Margaret and Theda Skocpol. 1985. βState Structures and the Possibilities for βKeynesianβ Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden Britain and the United States.β In Bringing the State Back In ed. by Peter B. Evans Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. New York: Cambridge University Press. 19 WORK-IN-PROGRESS Wildavsky Aaron and Ellen Tenenbaum. 1981. The Politics |
Similar Titles:
American Interest Group Politics in the 21st Century: Public and Private Interests and the Deadlock of American Public Policy
Varying Influence: The Roles of Public Opinion and Organized Interest in Public Policy in the American States
|
|