All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Can They Be Joined?
Unformatted Document Text:  REFERENCES Banerjee, Abhijit and Lakshmi Iyer. 2005. “History, Instutions and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India.” American Economic Review. Beck, Nathaniel. 2006. “Is Causal-Process Observation an Oxymoron?” Political Analysis 14:347–52. Brady, Henry E. and David C. Collier, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield. Brady, Henry E., David Collier and Jason Seawright. 2006. “Toward a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology.” Political Analysis 14:353–68. Braumoeller, Bear F. 2003. “Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics.” Political Analysis 11:209–33. Freedman, David A. 1991. “Statistical Models and Shoe Leather.” Sociological Methods 21:291–313. Hempel, Sandra. 2006. Medical Detective: John Snow and the Mystery of Cholera. London: Granta. King, Gary M., Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Lieberman, Evan S. 2003. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press. Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested analysis as mixed-method strategy for comparative re- search.” American Political Science Review 99:435–52. Mahoney, James and Gary Goertz. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14:227–49. Przeworski, Adam. Forthcoming. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In Handbook in Comparative Politics, ed. Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes. New York: Oxford. Stokes, Susan Carol. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambride University Press. Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of of Nuclear Non-Use.” International Organizations 53:433–68. 12

Authors: Beck, Nathaniel.
first   previous   Page 12 of 12   next   last



background image
REFERENCES
Banerjee, Abhijit and Lakshmi Iyer. 2005. “History, Instutions and Economic Performance:
The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India.” American Economic Review.
Beck, Nathaniel. 2006. “Is Causal-Process Observation an Oxymoron?” Political Analysis
14:347–52.
Brady, Henry E. and David C. Collier, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools,
Shared Standards. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Brady, Henry E., David Collier and Jason Seawright. 2006. “Toward a Pluralistic Vision of
Methodology.” Political Analysis 14:353–68.
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2003. “Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics.” Political Analysis
11:209–33.
Freedman, David A. 1991. “Statistical Models and Shoe Leather.” Sociological Methods
21:291–313.
Hempel, Sandra. 2006. Medical Detective: John Snow and the Mystery of Cholera. London:
Granta.
King, Gary M., Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry:
Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lieberman, Evan S. 2003. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and
South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested analysis as mixed-method strategy for comparative re-
search.” American Political Science Review 99:435–52.
Mahoney, James and Gary Goertz. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative
and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14:227–49.
Przeworski, Adam. Forthcoming. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In
Handbook in Comparative Politics, ed. Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes.
New York:
Oxford.
Stokes, Susan Carol. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin
America. New York: Cambride University Press.
Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis
of of Nuclear Non-Use.” International Organizations 53:433–68.
12


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 12 of 12   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.