REFERENCES
Banerjee, Abhijit and Lakshmi Iyer. 2005. “History, Instutions and Economic Performance:
The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India.” American Economic Review.
Beck, Nathaniel. 2006. “Is Causal-Process Observation an Oxymoron?” Political Analysis
14:347–52.
Brady, Henry E. and David C. Collier, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools,
Shared Standards. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
Brady, Henry E., David Collier and Jason Seawright. 2006. “Toward a Pluralistic Vision of
Methodology.” Political Analysis 14:353–68.
Braumoeller, Bear F. 2003. “Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics.” Political Analysis
11:209–33.
Freedman, David A. 1991. “Statistical Models and Shoe Leather.” Sociological Methods
21:291–313.
Hempel, Sandra. 2006. Medical Detective: John Snow and the Mystery of Cholera. London:
Granta.
King, Gary M., Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry:
Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lieberman, Evan S. 2003. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and
South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested analysis as mixed-method strategy for comparative re-
search.” American Political Science Review 99:435–52.
Mahoney, James and Gary Goertz. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative
and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14:227–49.
Przeworski, Adam. Forthcoming. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In
Handbook in Comparative Politics, ed. Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes.
New York:
Oxford.
Stokes, Susan Carol. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin
America. New York: Cambride University Press.
Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis
of of Nuclear Non-Use.” International Organizations 53:433–68.
12