|
|
|
|
Parrying with the Courts: Analyzing the Lochner Era through the Eyes of Organized Labor |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Constitutional scholarship that examines the class conflict of the Progressive Era almost invariably focuses on the development of “freedom of contract” jurisprudence and its chilling effects on labor reform and state economic intervention, which was most notoriously typified by the Supreme Court’s decision in Lochner v. New York. Lochner is the touchstone of modern constitutional scholarship for malfunctioning courts that substitute their own preferences for that of a legislature. In recent years there has been a concerted effort to rehabilitate to some degree the reputation of the Lochner Court. Scholars have argued that the justices did not pull freedom of contract out of the hat, and that furthermore, they were drawing on a long American constitutional tradition against class legislation that favored one group at the expense of others. My paper examines this revisionist view through the eyes of the Lochner Court’s victims – labor. By the time Lochner came down, organized labor had already abandoned efforts to pass protective legislation. Instead, they retreated to the private realm to escape the hostility of judicial review, relying on collective bargaining for economic advancement. However, the courts followed, thwarting organized labor’s attempts to bargain with employers with equity injunctions and antitrust enforcement. The same tension between judicial preferences for laissez-faire economics and commitment to state neutrality can be explored following the misadventures of organized labor before the courts in the early twentieth century, instead of tracking the downfall of economic due process during the New Deal. What is gained by studying this constitutional development through the eyes of organized labor is a better appreciation of the leading issues of the day, as well as renewed attention to one of the most significant transformations of the American constitutional order – the radical expansion of federal commerce clause authority in service of the New Deal. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
labor (226), court (191), law (115), constitut (87), would (83), state (78), afl (75), new (71), amend (69), american (62), organ (60), suprem (57), lochner (57), legisl (56), injunct (52), right (52), see (50), act (50), econom (47), power (47), u.s (46), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Martens, Allison. "Parrying with the Courts: Analyzing the Lochner Era through the Eyes of Organized Labor" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 31, 2006 <Not Available>. 2011-03-13 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p153106_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Martens, A. M. , 2006-08-31 "Parrying with the Courts: Analyzing the Lochner Era through the Eyes of Organized Labor" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA Online <PDF>. 2011-03-13 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p153106_index.html |
Publication Type: Proceeding Abstract: Constitutional scholarship that examines the class conflict of the Progressive Era almost invariably focuses on the development of “freedom of contract” jurisprudence and its chilling effects on labor reform and state economic intervention, which was most notoriously typified by the Supreme Court’s decision in Lochner v. New York. Lochner is the touchstone of modern constitutional scholarship for malfunctioning courts that substitute their own preferences for that of a legislature. In recent years there has been a concerted effort to rehabilitate to some degree the reputation of the Lochner Court. Scholars have argued that the justices did not pull freedom of contract out of the hat, and that furthermore, they were drawing on a long American constitutional tradition against class legislation that favored one group at the expense of others. My paper examines this revisionist view through the eyes of the Lochner Court’s victims – labor. By the time Lochner came down, organized labor had already abandoned efforts to pass protective legislation. Instead, they retreated to the private realm to escape the hostility of judicial review, relying on collective bargaining for economic advancement. However, the courts followed, thwarting organized labor’s attempts to bargain with employers with equity injunctions and antitrust enforcement. The same tension between judicial preferences for laissez-faire economics and commitment to state neutrality can be explored following the misadventures of organized labor before the courts in the early twentieth century, instead of tracking the downfall of economic due process during the New Deal. What is gained by studying this constitutional development through the eyes of organized labor is a better appreciation of the leading issues of the day, as well as renewed attention to one of the most significant transformations of the American constitutional order – the radical expansion of federal commerce clause authority in service of the New Deal. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
44 |
| Word count: |
15553 |
| Text sample: |
| Parrying with the Courts: Analyzing the Lochner Era through the Eyes of Organized Labor Allison M. Martens University of Texas at Austin amartens@mail.la.utexas.edu Prepared for delivery at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association August 30 – September 3 2006. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. 2 The only class which is distinctly arrayed against the court is a class that does not like courts at any rate and that is organized labor. That faction |
| scope of analysis by exploring the strategic calculus and the competitive interaction of social movements as they craft the claims they will bring before the courts and other constitutional arbiters. 43 long journey from Jacobs to Jones & Laughlin is that by examining that conflict from the perspective of those claiming the Constitution as their own a much wider field of conflict and complex negotiation for constitutional change can be appreciated and a fuller arsenal of constitutional arguments and |
Similar Titles:
Rejecting
Organic Change: Formal Amendment and Fixed Constitutions in Early
American State Constitution-making
“The Influence of State Constitutional Text on Policy Divergence: State Supreme Courts and the Blaine Amendments”
The Origins of Judicial Supremacy:State Courts, Party Politics and the Antebellum Surge in American Judicial Power
|
|