 |
Gender and Vote Choice in the 2006 Canadian Election
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
19
Table 4: The Estimated Impact of Values and Beliefs on Vote Choice
Conservative
Liberal
NDP
Women
Men
Women Men Women Men
Free enterprise
+10.9
+23.2
+0.8
-10.9
-11.7
-12.4
Continentalism
+20.4
+22.6
- 8.8
-9.0
-11.6
-13.6
Social conservatism
+23.1
+16.7
-13.0
-8.9
-10.2
-7.8
Religiosity
+11.6
-5.9
-3.0
+8.5
-8.7
-2.7
Racial minorities
-13.2
-7.9
+7.4
+5.2
+5.8
+2.7
Note: The cell entries are the differences in the mean estimated probability of voting for a party, first assuming that everyone is neutral or ambivalent on a given dimension and then assuming that everybody attains the maximum score, keeping the effects of social background characteristics and other values and beliefs unchanged. Separate models were estimated for women and men. All estimations are based on multinomial logistic regression. The value orientations were all coded on a -1 to +1 scale ‘1’. For details of scale construction, see the Appendix.
|
| | Authors: Gidengil, Elisabeth., Everitt, Joanna., Blais, Andr??., Fournier, Patrick. and Nevitte, Neil. |
|
| |
|
|
19
Table 4: The Estimated Impact of Values and Beliefs on Vote Choice
Conservative
Liberal
NDP
Women
Men
Women Men Women Men
Free enterprise
+10.9
+23.2
+0.8
-10.9
-11.7
-12.4
Continentalism
+20.4
+22.6
- 8.8
-9.0
-11.6
-13.6
Social conservatism
+23.1
+16.7
-13.0
-8.9
-10.2
-7.8
Religiosity
+11.6
-5.9
-3.0
+8.5
-8.7
-2.7
Racial minorities
-13.2
-7.9
+7.4
+5.2
+5.8
+2.7
Note: The cell entries are the differences in the mean estimated probability of voting for a party,
first assuming that everyone is neutral or ambivalent on a given dimension and then assuming
that everybody attains the maximum score, keeping the effects of social background
characteristics and other values and beliefs unchanged. Separate models were estimated for
women and men. All estimations are based on multinomial logistic regression. The value
orientations were all coded on a -1 to +1 scale ‘1’. For details of scale construction, see the
Appendix.
|
|
 Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
